土木建筑与环境工程
土木建築與環境工程
토목건축여배경공정
JOURNAL OF CIVIL, ARCHITECTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
2015年
1期
40-46
,共7页
室内热湿环境%住宅建筑%梅雨季节%能耗%数值模拟
室內熱濕環境%住宅建築%梅雨季節%能耗%數值模擬
실내열습배경%주택건축%매우계절%능모%수치모의
indoor hygrothermal conditions%residential building%plum rain season%energy consumption%numerical simulation
经过调研得到长江中下游地区(以南京为例)梅雨季节住宅建筑室内热湿状况,并分析3种不同建筑能耗计算模型(整体建筑热湿空气流动耦合模型 HAM ,传递函数模型CTF ,有效湿渗透深度模型EMPD)的准确性。数值模型基于Matlab‐Simulink编写,使用调研数据进行验证,进而使用梅雨季节典型气象参数模拟分析。调研结果显示在2013年梅雨季节,多数时间内建筑室内温度高于28℃,相对湿度高于70%。数值模拟结果显示3种能耗模型对室内温度模拟的差异较小,而对室内湿度的模拟存在较大差异,特别是CTF模型误差最大。结果显示在长江中下游地区梅雨季节,当房间换气次数小于2 ACH时,围护结构对于室内环境湿缓冲的作用明显,选择合适的吸放湿材料可有效降低建筑能耗30%以上。
經過調研得到長江中下遊地區(以南京為例)梅雨季節住宅建築室內熱濕狀況,併分析3種不同建築能耗計算模型(整體建築熱濕空氣流動耦閤模型 HAM ,傳遞函數模型CTF ,有效濕滲透深度模型EMPD)的準確性。數值模型基于Matlab‐Simulink編寫,使用調研數據進行驗證,進而使用梅雨季節典型氣象參數模擬分析。調研結果顯示在2013年梅雨季節,多數時間內建築室內溫度高于28℃,相對濕度高于70%。數值模擬結果顯示3種能耗模型對室內溫度模擬的差異較小,而對室內濕度的模擬存在較大差異,特彆是CTF模型誤差最大。結果顯示在長江中下遊地區梅雨季節,噹房間換氣次數小于2 ACH時,圍護結構對于室內環境濕緩遲的作用明顯,選擇閤適的吸放濕材料可有效降低建築能耗30%以上。
경과조연득도장강중하유지구(이남경위례)매우계절주택건축실내열습상황,병분석3충불동건축능모계산모형(정체건축열습공기류동우합모형 HAM ,전체함수모형CTF ,유효습삼투심도모형EMPD)적준학성。수치모형기우Matlab‐Simulink편사,사용조연수거진행험증,진이사용매우계절전형기상삼수모의분석。조연결과현시재2013년매우계절,다수시간내건축실내온도고우28℃,상대습도고우70%。수치모의결과현시3충능모모형대실내온도모의적차이교소,이대실내습도적모의존재교대차이,특별시CTF모형오차최대。결과현시재장강중하유지구매우계절,당방간환기차수소우2 ACH시,위호결구대우실내배경습완충적작용명현,선택합괄적흡방습재료가유효강저건축능모30%이상。
T he indoor thermal conditions of residential buildings during the plum rain season in East China (Nanjing for example) were obtained and the accuracy of three different building energy consumption models (whole building heat ,air and moisture model HAM ,conduction transfer function model CTF , effective moisture penetration depth model EMPD) were analyzed .The numerical model was implemented into Matlab‐Simulink and was validated using measured data from a field survey .Then the validated model was used for simulation analysis using typical weather data of plum rain season .The results from the survey showing the indoor temperature was higher than 28℃ and the indoor relative humidity was higher than 70% in most time of the plum rain season of 2013. Simulation results showed that there was not much difference when using the three models for thermal simulations ,however ,using CTF model for moisture simulation would result in large inaccuracy .During the plum rain season in Southeast China ,when the room ventilation rate is less than 2 ACH ,the moisture buffering effect of building envelope is obvious and the choice of proper hygroscopic materials can save up to 30% of building energy consumption .