产经评论
產經評論
산경평론
INDUSTRIAL ECONOMIC REVIEW
2015年
1期
114-125
,共12页
投入产出%超效率三阶段DEA%Malmquist模型
投入產齣%超效率三階段DEA%Malmquist模型
투입산출%초효솔삼계단DEA%Malmquist모형
input and output%the three_stage super efficiency DEA model%malmquist index
从投入产出角度,运用超效率三阶段DEA模型与Malmquist模型相结合的分析方法,修正了环境因素与随机因素的影响,从静态与动态的时间角度对2008_2012年我国30个省(市、自治区)经济发展效率进行分析。结果表明:从静态层面看,我国各省经济发展效率不容乐观,综合效率值较低,大约2/3省的经济发展都处于低效状态;经济发展效率受环境影响较大,剔除环境因素的影响后,各省综合效率均显著下降;三大区域中,东部地区经济发展效率仍处于领先地位,西部地区次之,中部地区最低,但整体来看区域间经济发展效率差异逐渐减小。从动态层面看,通过Malmquist模型分析,考察期间全要素效率和综合技术效率M值逐年下降,技术进步效率逐渐增长,且全要素效率下降的主要原因是纯技术效率下降。因此,各地区应该充分发挥优势,加快技术创新,提高规模效率,进一步提升发展水平。
從投入產齣角度,運用超效率三階段DEA模型與Malmquist模型相結閤的分析方法,脩正瞭環境因素與隨機因素的影響,從靜態與動態的時間角度對2008_2012年我國30箇省(市、自治區)經濟髮展效率進行分析。結果錶明:從靜態層麵看,我國各省經濟髮展效率不容樂觀,綜閤效率值較低,大約2/3省的經濟髮展都處于低效狀態;經濟髮展效率受環境影響較大,剔除環境因素的影響後,各省綜閤效率均顯著下降;三大區域中,東部地區經濟髮展效率仍處于領先地位,西部地區次之,中部地區最低,但整體來看區域間經濟髮展效率差異逐漸減小。從動態層麵看,通過Malmquist模型分析,攷察期間全要素效率和綜閤技術效率M值逐年下降,技術進步效率逐漸增長,且全要素效率下降的主要原因是純技術效率下降。因此,各地區應該充分髮揮優勢,加快技術創新,提高規模效率,進一步提升髮展水平。
종투입산출각도,운용초효솔삼계단DEA모형여Malmquist모형상결합적분석방법,수정료배경인소여수궤인소적영향,종정태여동태적시간각도대2008_2012년아국30개성(시、자치구)경제발전효솔진행분석。결과표명:종정태층면간,아국각성경제발전효솔불용악관,종합효솔치교저,대약2/3성적경제발전도처우저효상태;경제발전효솔수배경영향교대,척제배경인소적영향후,각성종합효솔균현저하강;삼대구역중,동부지구경제발전효솔잉처우령선지위,서부지구차지,중부지구최저,단정체래간구역간경제발전효솔차이축점감소。종동태층면간,통과Malmquist모형분석,고찰기간전요소효솔화종합기술효솔M치축년하강,기술진보효솔축점증장,차전요소효솔하강적주요원인시순기술효솔하강。인차,각지구응해충분발휘우세,가쾌기술창신,제고규모효솔,진일보제승발전수평。
Viewing from the input and output of China's economic development,the economic develop-ment efficiency of 30 provinces in China during the period of 2008_2012 is analyzed by using the Malmquist Index model,while the impact of environment variables and random interference factors is revised. The result shows that,from static perspective,the development efficiency of the provinces under study is far from satis-factory. The comprehensive efficiency index is low. In about two thirds of the studied provinces,the economic development is of poor efficiency. The environment has great impact on the economic development efficiency. With the environmental factors being eliminated,the comprehensive efficiency of all provinces is in significant decline. Of the three geographical regions,the east takes the lead in development efficiency,followed by the western region and with the central being the lowest. In general,however,the regional gap in economic devel-opment efficiency is narrowing gradually. From dynamic perspective,through the analysis of Malmquist Index model,the total factor efficiency and the M value of comprehensive technology efficiency are decreasing year by year,whereas the technological progress efficiency is increasing annually. Since the decrease of total factor efficiency is caused mainly by the decrease of technology efficiency,the different regions should try to bring their strengths into full play,quicken the steps of technological innovation,increase scale efficiency and en-hance further the level of their economic development.