现代检验医学杂志
現代檢驗醫學雜誌
현대검험의학잡지
JOURNAL OF MODERN LABORATORY MEDICINE
2015年
1期
128-131
,共4页
重度乳糜血%反应类型%生化检测方法
重度乳糜血%反應類型%生化檢測方法
중도유미혈%반응류형%생화검측방법
severe chyle blood serum%reaction type%biochemical detection method
目的:探讨重度乳糜血标本对比色终点法、速率法以及透射比浊法三种常见类型生化检测方法所造成影响的差别。方法选取外观正常的混合血清标本20份,每份分成 A,B,C,D,E,F和 G 7个1 ml血清的实验组与1个对照组,实验组从A~G依次加入脂肪乳液10,20,40,80,160,320μl和640μl配制成浊度呈递增式的模拟乳糜血清标本。各血清均进行以葡萄糖(Glu)、尿酸(UA)、总胆红素(TBil)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、载脂蛋白 A1(apoA1)、β2微球蛋白(β2-MG)作为代表的比色终点法、速率法以及透射比浊法三种常见反应类型生化项目的检测,各实验组换算后结果与对照组分别进行配对t检验。结果透射比浊法中三个生化项目所有实验组与对照组差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.842~29.465,P 值均<0.05)。比色终点法中除了 Glu实验组 A组与对照组差异无统计学意义(t=1.875,P=0.068>0.05)外,其它实验组与对照组差异均有统计学意义(t=-34.942~13.884,P值均<0.05)。速率法中除了 GGT实验组 B,C组与对照组差异有统计学意义(t=2.234和5.006,P值均<0.05)外,其它可检测的实验组与对照组差异均无统计学意义(t=-1.532~1.619,P值均>0.05)。结论三种常见类型生化检测方法中乳糜血标本对比色终点法和透射比浊法影响较大,对速率法影响相对较小。
目的:探討重度乳糜血標本對比色終點法、速率法以及透射比濁法三種常見類型生化檢測方法所造成影響的差彆。方法選取外觀正常的混閤血清標本20份,每份分成 A,B,C,D,E,F和 G 7箇1 ml血清的實驗組與1箇對照組,實驗組從A~G依次加入脂肪乳液10,20,40,80,160,320μl和640μl配製成濁度呈遞增式的模擬乳糜血清標本。各血清均進行以葡萄糖(Glu)、尿痠(UA)、總膽紅素(TBil)、天門鼕氨痠氨基轉移酶(AST)、γ-穀氨酰轉肽酶(GGT)、乳痠脫氫酶(LDH)、超敏C反應蛋白(hs-CRP)、載脂蛋白 A1(apoA1)、β2微毬蛋白(β2-MG)作為代錶的比色終點法、速率法以及透射比濁法三種常見反應類型生化項目的檢測,各實驗組換算後結果與對照組分彆進行配對t檢驗。結果透射比濁法中三箇生化項目所有實驗組與對照組差異均有統計學意義(t=-2.842~29.465,P 值均<0.05)。比色終點法中除瞭 Glu實驗組 A組與對照組差異無統計學意義(t=1.875,P=0.068>0.05)外,其它實驗組與對照組差異均有統計學意義(t=-34.942~13.884,P值均<0.05)。速率法中除瞭 GGT實驗組 B,C組與對照組差異有統計學意義(t=2.234和5.006,P值均<0.05)外,其它可檢測的實驗組與對照組差異均無統計學意義(t=-1.532~1.619,P值均>0.05)。結論三種常見類型生化檢測方法中乳糜血標本對比色終點法和透射比濁法影響較大,對速率法影響相對較小。
목적:탐토중도유미혈표본대비색종점법、속솔법이급투사비탁법삼충상견류형생화검측방법소조성영향적차별。방법선취외관정상적혼합혈청표본20빈,매빈분성 A,B,C,D,E,F화 G 7개1 ml혈청적실험조여1개대조조,실험조종A~G의차가입지방유액10,20,40,80,160,320μl화640μl배제성탁도정체증식적모의유미혈청표본。각혈청균진행이포도당(Glu)、뇨산(UA)、총담홍소(TBil)、천문동안산안기전이매(AST)、γ-곡안선전태매(GGT)、유산탈경매(LDH)、초민C반응단백(hs-CRP)、재지단백 A1(apoA1)、β2미구단백(β2-MG)작위대표적비색종점법、속솔법이급투사비탁법삼충상견반응류형생화항목적검측,각실험조환산후결과여대조조분별진행배대t검험。결과투사비탁법중삼개생화항목소유실험조여대조조차이균유통계학의의(t=-2.842~29.465,P 치균<0.05)。비색종점법중제료 Glu실험조 A조여대조조차이무통계학의의(t=1.875,P=0.068>0.05)외,기타실험조여대조조차이균유통계학의의(t=-34.942~13.884,P치균<0.05)。속솔법중제료 GGT실험조 B,C조여대조조차이유통계학의의(t=2.234화5.006,P치균<0.05)외,기타가검측적실험조여대조조차이균무통계학의의(t=-1.532~1.619,P치균>0.05)。결론삼충상견류형생화검측방법중유미혈표본대비색종점법화투사비탁법영향교대,대속솔법영향상대교소。
Objective Aim to explore how severe chyle blood serum effects on the End-point method of colorimetry,velocity method,immunological transmission turbidimetry(TIA)three types of common biochemical tests and their different influ-ences.Methods Collected 20 normal appearance serums,divided each pooled serum into A,B,C,D,E,F and G 7 experimen-tal groups and one control group.Each group contented for 1ml serum.Added intralipid 10,20,40,80,160μl and 320μl to the experimental groups from A to G in turn to prepare into different concentrations of simulate chylous samples.Tested each group by the End-point method of colorimetry,velocity method and TIA which represented by Glucose (Glu),uric acid (UA),Total bilirubin (TBil),aspartate aminotransferase (AST),gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT),lactate dehydro-genase (LDH),hypersensitive C reactive protein (hs-CRP),Apolipoprotein A1 (apoA1 )andβ2-microglobulin (β2-MG). Used pair T test for both experimental group and their control group.Results In terms of TIA,there were statistical differ-ences between all the experimental groups and their control groups in the three projects (t=-2.842~29.465,P<0.05).In terms of the End-point method of colorimetry,there were statistical differences between all the experimental groups and their control groups (t=-34.942~13.884,P<0.05)except for A group in Glu experiment (t=1.875,P=0.068>0.05).In terms of velocity method,there were no statistical differences between all the experimental groups and their control groups (t=-1.532~1.619,P>0.05)except for the B and C groups in GGT experiment (t=2.234&5.006,P<0.05).Conclusion Severe chyle blood serum had significant influence on the End-point method of colorimetry and TIA,as well as less influ-ence on velocity method.