CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨胺碘酮治疗老年人室性心律失常的临床疗效。方法选取我院收治的老年人室性心律失常患者80例，随机分为观察组（40例）和对照组（40例），两组患者均进行常规的基础治疗；对常规治疗无效者，对照组不予处理，观察组另给予胺碘酮治疗。比较两组患者的治疗效果及不良反应。结果观察组患者的总有效率高于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（P ＜0．05）；两组患者的不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义（P ＞0．05）。结论胺碘酮治疗老年人室性心律失常效果明显，并且不良反应小，具有一定的临床应用价值。
목적：탐토알전동치료노년인실성심률실상적림상료효。방법선취아원수치적노년인실성심률실상환자80례，수궤분위관찰조（40례）화대조조（40례），량조환자균진행상규적기출치료；대상규치료무효자，대조조불여처리，관찰조령급여알전동치료。비교량조환자적치료효과급불량반응。결과관찰조환자적총유효솔고우대조조，차이구유통계학의의（P ＜0．05）；량조환자적불량반응발생솔비교차이무통계학의의（P ＞0．05）。결론알전동치료노년인실성심률실상효과명현，병차불량반응소，구유일정적림상응용개치。
Obj ective To assess the outcome of Amiodarone in treating ventricular arrhythmia for elderly pa-tients . Methods Eighty elderly patients with ventricular arrhythmia carried at our hospital were collected and were randomly divided into an observation group (n =40)and a control group (n =40),all patients of the two group received conventional basic treatment;if conventional treatment was ineffective,patients of the con-trol group were given no additional treatment,and patients of the observation group received Amiodarone addi-tionally.Compared the therapeutic effects and the adverse reactions of the two groups. Results The total ef-fective rate of observation group was significantly higher than the control group,group- paired comparison yielded statistical significant difference (P <0.05).Group-paired comparison of adverse reactions incidence yielded no statistical differences (P >0.05). Conclusion The results of Amiodarone for treatment of ven-tricular arrhythmia in elderly patients are satisfactory,which has minimal adverse reaction incidence,so it has clinical application value.