局解手术学杂志
跼解手術學雜誌
국해수술학잡지
JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY
2015年
1期
33-35,36
,共4页
叶勇%马金良%余继海%许戈良%李建生%荚卫东
葉勇%馬金良%餘繼海%許戈良%李建生%莢衛東
협용%마금량%여계해%허과량%리건생%협위동
门静脉高压症%断流术%食管旁静脉
門靜脈高壓癥%斷流術%食管徬靜脈
문정맥고압증%단류술%식관방정맥
portal hypertension%devascularization%paraesophageal vein
目的:探讨选择性贲门周围血管离断术的临床应用效果。方法回顾性分析我院2010年1月至2013年8月86例肝硬化门脉高压接受断流手术患者的临床资料,按手术方式将其分为选择性断流组和传统断流组,对比2组的手术情况、术后肝功能指标、术后并发症情况。结果选择性断流组手术时间延长,FFP术后降低明显(P<0.05),出血量和输血例数2组间无统计学差异(P>0.05);选择性断流组术后ALT和AST峰值、并发症发生率均低于传统断流组(P<0.05);选择性断流组平均术后住院时间较传统断流组缩短(P<0.05)。结论选择性断流术能够更有效降低门静脉压力、减少术后近期并发症,值得临床推广。
目的:探討選擇性賁門週圍血管離斷術的臨床應用效果。方法迴顧性分析我院2010年1月至2013年8月86例肝硬化門脈高壓接受斷流手術患者的臨床資料,按手術方式將其分為選擇性斷流組和傳統斷流組,對比2組的手術情況、術後肝功能指標、術後併髮癥情況。結果選擇性斷流組手術時間延長,FFP術後降低明顯(P<0.05),齣血量和輸血例數2組間無統計學差異(P>0.05);選擇性斷流組術後ALT和AST峰值、併髮癥髮生率均低于傳統斷流組(P<0.05);選擇性斷流組平均術後住院時間較傳統斷流組縮短(P<0.05)。結論選擇性斷流術能夠更有效降低門靜脈壓力、減少術後近期併髮癥,值得臨床推廣。
목적:탐토선택성분문주위혈관리단술적림상응용효과。방법회고성분석아원2010년1월지2013년8월86례간경화문맥고압접수단류수술환자적림상자료,안수술방식장기분위선택성단류조화전통단류조,대비2조적수술정황、술후간공능지표、술후병발증정황。결과선택성단류조수술시간연장,FFP술후강저명현(P<0.05),출혈량화수혈례수2조간무통계학차이(P>0.05);선택성단류조술후ALT화AST봉치、병발증발생솔균저우전통단류조(P<0.05);선택성단류조평균술후주원시간교전통단류조축단(P<0.05)。결론선택성단류술능구경유효강저문정맥압력、감소술후근기병발증,치득림상추엄。
Objective To determine efficacy of selective devascularization in management of portal hypertension. Methods The clini-cal data of 86 patients of portal hypertension in our hospital from Jan. 2010 to Aug. 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the selective group and the nonselectove devascularization group according to the different devascularization ways. The postopera-tive liver function index and complications were analyzed. Results In selective devascularization group, the surgery time was prolonged (P<0. 05), the postoperative FPP was reduced (P<0. 05), and there was no difference in bleeding volume and blood transfusion cases (P>0. 05). The postoperative peak value of ALT and AST and postoperative pomplications in the selective devascularization group were low-er than those in the nonselectove devascularization group (P<0. 05). And patients in the selective devascularization group have a shorter hospital stay compared to the nonselectove devascularization group (P<0. 05). Conclusion Selective devascularization can lower free portal pressure more effectively, reduce incidence rates of postoperative early complications, and it is worthy of clinical promotion.