CAJ | 학술논문

《精神卫生法》将强制住院类型分为医学保护性住院和保安性住院。针对严重精神病患者，若已经发生伤害自身的行为或有伤害自身的危险，可以对其实施医学保护性住院治疗，但其具有限制人身自由的属性。而《精神卫生法》第三十一条却将医学保护性住院治疗的同意权单独授予监护人，患者出院也需要监护人的同意。此规定缺乏正当性，侵害了患者的正当权利。而这一规定存在的原因有多种，如医疗父权主义思想的影响，将精神障碍当然地视为无民事行为能力等。
《정신위생법》장강제주원류형분위의학보호성주원화보안성주원。침대엄중정신병환자，약이경발생상해자신적행위혹유상해자신적위험，가이대기실시의학보호성주원치료，단기구유한제인신자유적속성。이《정신위생법》제삼십일조각장의학보호성주원치료적동의권단독수여감호인，환자출원야수요감호인적동의。차규정결핍정당성，침해료환자적정당권리。이저일규정존재적원인유다충，여의료부권주의사상적영향，장정신장애당연지시위무민사행위능력등。
The hospitalization has been divided into medical protective hospitalization and security hospitalization according to the Mental Health Law .The former would be adopted while the severe mental patients have hurt themselves or had the risk of hurting ,but the measures have the characteristic of restriction of personal freedom .The guardians of the patients have been delegated the rights to consent of medical protective hospitalization and releasing from hospital according to the Article 31 of Mental Health Law ,which is lack of justness and encroach the rights of the patients .The Article 31 has been influenced by some matters ,such as medical paternalism and the patients being presumed no capacity for civil conduct .