中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2015年
7期
752-755
,共4页
张燕%王艳%王加风%李婷%卜玲%杨卉
張燕%王豔%王加風%李婷%蔔玲%楊卉
장연%왕염%왕가풍%리정%복령%양훼
腹膜透析%腹膜炎%品管圈
腹膜透析%腹膜炎%品管圈
복막투석%복막염%품관권
Peritoneal dialysis%Peritonitis%Quality control circle
目的:探讨品管圈活动在降低腹膜透析患者腹膜炎发生率中的应用效果。方法选择2012年1—12月腹膜透析患者50例为对照组,2013年1—12月腹膜透析患者66例为试验组,两组患者均实施常规的护理,试验组在此基础上开展品管圈活动,成立品管圈活动小组,分析发生腹膜炎的原因、设定目标、制定对策并实施,比较实施品管圈活动前后两组患者腹膜炎发生率。结果开展品管圈活动后居家腹膜透析患者腹膜炎发生率从30.0%下降到7.5%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=10.026, P<0.01)。结论将品管圈活动应用于临床护理工作中,通过品管圈成员间的相互协作,找出和分析发生问题的原因、设定目标、制定对策并实施和效果评价等,可促进护理质量的持续改进。
目的:探討品管圈活動在降低腹膜透析患者腹膜炎髮生率中的應用效果。方法選擇2012年1—12月腹膜透析患者50例為對照組,2013年1—12月腹膜透析患者66例為試驗組,兩組患者均實施常規的護理,試驗組在此基礎上開展品管圈活動,成立品管圈活動小組,分析髮生腹膜炎的原因、設定目標、製定對策併實施,比較實施品管圈活動前後兩組患者腹膜炎髮生率。結果開展品管圈活動後居傢腹膜透析患者腹膜炎髮生率從30.0%下降到7.5%,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(χ2=10.026, P<0.01)。結論將品管圈活動應用于臨床護理工作中,通過品管圈成員間的相互協作,找齣和分析髮生問題的原因、設定目標、製定對策併實施和效果評價等,可促進護理質量的持續改進。
목적:탐토품관권활동재강저복막투석환자복막염발생솔중적응용효과。방법선택2012년1—12월복막투석환자50례위대조조,2013년1—12월복막투석환자66례위시험조,량조환자균실시상규적호리,시험조재차기출상개전품관권활동,성립품관권활동소조,분석발생복막염적원인、설정목표、제정대책병실시,비교실시품관권활동전후량조환자복막염발생솔。결과개전품관권활동후거가복막투석환자복막염발생솔종30.0%하강도7.5%,량조비교차이유통계학의의(χ2=10.026, P<0.01)。결론장품관권활동응용우림상호리공작중,통과품관권성원간적상호협작,조출화분석발생문제적원인、설정목표、제정대책병실시화효과평개등,가촉진호리질량적지속개진。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of quality control circle ( QCC) on reducing peritonitis rate in patients with peritoneal dialysis. Methods From January to November in 2012, 50 patients with peritoneal dialysis were chosen as the control group (before QCC). During January to November in 2013, 66 patients with peritoneal dialysis were selected for the experimental group ( after QCC) . Routine nursing was implemented in two groups, but QCC, which establish activity subject, investigate the reason of present situation, analysis the reason of peritonitis, set goals, develop strategies and implement, was carried out in the experimental group. We compared the differences between before and after the implementation of QCC activity in patients with peritonitis rates. Results The peritonitis incidence decreased from 30. 0% to 7. 5% in patients with peritoneal dialysis who carried out quality control circle at home, and there was statistically significant difference (χ2 =10. 026,P <0. 01). Conclusions we can promote the continuous improvement of nursing quality by cooperating between QCC members, find out and analyzing the cause of the problems, set goals, develop strategies and implementation, and perform the evaluation.