CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨红外线扫温枪在老年科的应用。方法选择2013年1—12月的老年患者200例,分别采用水银体温计测腋温(对照组)和红外线扫温枪测腋部、额部、颈部、内关体温(研究组),比较两组患者测量体温时间与终末消毒时间,5种方法测温效果,患者与护士对红外线测温仪测额部、颈部及内关部位测量使用的认可情况。结果研究组患者测量体温时间与终末消毒时间分别为(0.1±0.0)与(0.5±0.0)min,短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为20.61,49.71；P<0.01)。红外线扫温枪测额温与水银体温计测腋温差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而红外线腋温、颈温和内关温测量与水银体温计测腋温差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。患者与护士对红外线测温仪测颈部及内关部位较认可。结论红外线扫温枪测颈温和内关体温与水银体温计具有同样的稳定性和准确性。
목적：탐토홍외선소온창재노년과적응용。방법선택2013년1—12월적노년환자200례,분별채용수은체온계측액온(대조조)화홍외선소온창측액부、액부、경부、내관체온(연구조),비교량조환자측량체온시간여종말소독시간,5충방법측온효과,환자여호사대홍외선측온의측액부、경부급내관부위측량사용적인가정황。결과연구조환자측량체온시간여종말소독시간분별위(0.1±0.0)여(0.5±0.0)min,단우대조조,차이유통계학의의(t치분별위20.61,49.71；P<0.01)。홍외선소온창측액온여수은체온계측액온차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),이홍외선액온、경온화내관온측량여수은체온계측액온차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。환자여호사대홍외선측온의측경부급내관부위교인가。결론홍외선소온창측경온화내관체온여수은체온계구유동양적은정성화준학성。
Objective To explore the effect of infrared scanning temperature gun in geriatrics department. Methods A total of 200 cases of elderly patients were divided into control group with mercury thermometer ( armpit) and the test group with infrared scanning temperature gun ( armpit,mild forehead, neck, neiguan) . The time of measuring temperature and sterilization, and the effects on measuring temperature were compared. Results The time of measuring temperature and sterilization in the test group were (0. 1 ± 0. 0) and (0. 5 ± 0. 0 ) min, which were significantly shorter than those of the control group ( t = 20. 61, 49. 71, respectively;P<0. 01). There was a significant difference in the forehead temperature measured by infrared scanning temperature gun and the armpit temperature measured by mercury thermometer (P<0. 05). However, there was no significant difference in the armpit, neck and neiguan temperature measured by infrared scanning temperature gun and the armpit temperature measured by mercury thermometer (P>0. 05). Patients and nurses were more likely to the neck and neiguan measuring by infrared scanning temperature gun. Conclusions The stability and accuracy of infrared scanning temperature gun measuring neck and neiguan is same as the mercury thermometer.