中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2015年
7期
806-809
,共4页
陈月香%孙国珍%刘扣英%丁玉%孔祥清
陳月香%孫國珍%劉釦英%丁玉%孔祥清
진월향%손국진%류구영%정옥%공상청
生活质量%健康状况%肺高压%影响因素
生活質量%健康狀況%肺高壓%影響因素
생활질량%건강상황%폐고압%영향인소
Quality of life%Health status%Pulmonary hypertension%Influencing factors
目的:调查肺高压患者健康相关生活质量现状,探讨其影响因素。方法采用便利抽样法,运用一般资料调查表、中文版明尼苏达心力衰竭生活质量问卷( MLHF-PH )、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、社会支持评定量表(SSRS)、慢性病自我效能感量表(SECD6)与医学应对方式量表(MCMQ)对2013年5月—2014年5月165例肺高压患者进行问卷调查。结果肺高压患者 MLHF-PH 平均分(41.93±18.98)分。婚姻状况、不同职业、费用主要来源、疾病类型之间的患者MLHF-PH得分比较,差异有统计学意义(F值分别为6.692,8.593,3.342,4.388;P<0.05)。多元逐步回归分析显示mMRC呼吸困难分级、抑郁、6 min步行距离、纽约心功能分级、症状个数及住院次数纳入回归方程,能解释总变异量的78.1%。结论肺高压患者健康相关生活质量总体处于较低水平,医护人员应给予针对性干预措施,以提高患者健康相关的生活质量。
目的:調查肺高壓患者健康相關生活質量現狀,探討其影響因素。方法採用便利抽樣法,運用一般資料調查錶、中文版明尼囌達心力衰竭生活質量問捲( MLHF-PH )、醫院焦慮抑鬱量錶(HADS)、社會支持評定量錶(SSRS)、慢性病自我效能感量錶(SECD6)與醫學應對方式量錶(MCMQ)對2013年5月—2014年5月165例肺高壓患者進行問捲調查。結果肺高壓患者 MLHF-PH 平均分(41.93±18.98)分。婚姻狀況、不同職業、費用主要來源、疾病類型之間的患者MLHF-PH得分比較,差異有統計學意義(F值分彆為6.692,8.593,3.342,4.388;P<0.05)。多元逐步迴歸分析顯示mMRC呼吸睏難分級、抑鬱、6 min步行距離、紐約心功能分級、癥狀箇數及住院次數納入迴歸方程,能解釋總變異量的78.1%。結論肺高壓患者健康相關生活質量總體處于較低水平,醫護人員應給予針對性榦預措施,以提高患者健康相關的生活質量。
목적:조사폐고압환자건강상관생활질량현상,탐토기영향인소。방법채용편리추양법,운용일반자료조사표、중문판명니소체심력쇠갈생활질량문권( MLHF-PH )、의원초필억욱량표(HADS)、사회지지평정량표(SSRS)、만성병자아효능감량표(SECD6)여의학응대방식량표(MCMQ)대2013년5월—2014년5월165례폐고압환자진행문권조사。결과폐고압환자 MLHF-PH 평균분(41.93±18.98)분。혼인상황、불동직업、비용주요래원、질병류형지간적환자MLHF-PH득분비교,차이유통계학의의(F치분별위6.692,8.593,3.342,4.388;P<0.05)。다원축보회귀분석현시mMRC호흡곤난분급、억욱、6 min보행거리、뉴약심공능분급、증상개수급주원차수납입회귀방정,능해석총변이량적78.1%。결론폐고압환자건강상관생활질량총체처우교저수평,의호인원응급여침대성간예조시,이제고환자건강상관적생활질량。
Objective To investigate the status of Health-related Quality of Life ( HRQOL) in patients with pulmonary hypertension and analyze its influencing factors. Methods A total of 165 patients with pulmonary hypertension were surveyed by General Information Questionnaire, Chinese version of Minnesota Living with Heart Failure-modified for PH ( MLHF-PH ) , Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ( HADS ) , Social Support Rating Scale ( SSRS ) , Self-efficacy Management of Chronic Disease ( SECD6 ) and Medical Coping Method Questionnaire (MCMQ). Results The score of MLHF-PH was (41. 93 ± 18. 98), and the scores of MLHF-PH in marital status, different occupations, fee resource and disease type were statistically significant (F =6. 692,8. 593, 3. 342, 4. 388, respectively;P <0. 05). The multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that the severity of mMRC dyspnea, status of depression, 6 minute walk test distance, New York Heart Association ( NYHA ) functional classification, symptoms and times of hospitalization were introduced into the regression model, which could explain 78. 1% of the total variance. Conclusions The general health related quality of life in pulmonary hypertension patients were at a low level. Doctors and nurses should implement particular measurements according to their conditions to improve their quality of life.