重庆医学
重慶醫學
중경의학
CHONGQING MEDICAL JOURNAL
2015年
6期
785-787
,共3页
重度牙周炎%冠心病%肿瘤坏死因子%白细胞介素-6%C 反应蛋白%翻瓣术
重度牙週炎%冠心病%腫瘤壞死因子%白細胞介素-6%C 反應蛋白%翻瓣術
중도아주염%관심병%종류배사인자%백세포개소-6%C 반응단백%번판술
severe periodontitis%coronary heart disease%tumor necrosis factor-alpha%interleukin-6%c-reactive protein%periodontal flap therapy
目的:探讨老年冠心病伴重度牙周炎患者不同牙周治疗后,牙周状况及血清肿瘤坏死因子(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和 C 反应蛋白(CRP)的变化。方法将90例伴有重度牙周炎的老年冠心病患者分为3组,每组30例,对照组仅进行冠心病治疗,基础组在冠心病治疗基础上进行牙周基础治疗,联合组患者在冠心病治疗基础上进行牙周基础治疗和翻瓣术,比较3组各观察指标的差异。结果联合组和基础组经牙周基础治疗后,牙周袋深度(PD)、龈沟出血指数(SBI)、斑指数(PLI)、探诊深度、探诊出血均明显下降(P <0.05),并有显著的附着获得(P <0.05);联合组与基础组治疗后比较,PD、SBI、临床附着丧失(CAL)、探诊深度、探诊出血差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。治疗后,联合组和基础组 TNF-α、IL-6及 CRP 水平较对照组明显降低(P <0.05);基础组和联合组治疗后血清中 TNF-α、IL-6及 CRP 水平比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论牙周治疗和翻瓣术均能降低老年冠心病患者相关血清炎性因子 TNF-α、IL-6和 CRP 水平,但相对于牙周基础治疗,翻瓣术效果更佳。
目的:探討老年冠心病伴重度牙週炎患者不同牙週治療後,牙週狀況及血清腫瘤壞死因子(TNF-α)、白細胞介素-6(IL-6)和 C 反應蛋白(CRP)的變化。方法將90例伴有重度牙週炎的老年冠心病患者分為3組,每組30例,對照組僅進行冠心病治療,基礎組在冠心病治療基礎上進行牙週基礎治療,聯閤組患者在冠心病治療基礎上進行牙週基礎治療和翻瓣術,比較3組各觀察指標的差異。結果聯閤組和基礎組經牙週基礎治療後,牙週袋深度(PD)、齦溝齣血指數(SBI)、斑指數(PLI)、探診深度、探診齣血均明顯下降(P <0.05),併有顯著的附著穫得(P <0.05);聯閤組與基礎組治療後比較,PD、SBI、臨床附著喪失(CAL)、探診深度、探診齣血差異有統計學意義(P <0.05)。治療後,聯閤組和基礎組 TNF-α、IL-6及 CRP 水平較對照組明顯降低(P <0.05);基礎組和聯閤組治療後血清中 TNF-α、IL-6及 CRP 水平比較,差異有統計學意義(P <0.05)。結論牙週治療和翻瓣術均能降低老年冠心病患者相關血清炎性因子 TNF-α、IL-6和 CRP 水平,但相對于牙週基礎治療,翻瓣術效果更佳。
목적:탐토노년관심병반중도아주염환자불동아주치료후,아주상황급혈청종류배사인자(TNF-α)、백세포개소-6(IL-6)화 C 반응단백(CRP)적변화。방법장90례반유중도아주염적노년관심병환자분위3조,매조30례,대조조부진행관심병치료,기출조재관심병치료기출상진행아주기출치료,연합조환자재관심병치료기출상진행아주기출치료화번판술,비교3조각관찰지표적차이。결과연합조화기출조경아주기출치료후,아주대심도(PD)、간구출혈지수(SBI)、반지수(PLI)、탐진심도、탐진출혈균명현하강(P <0.05),병유현저적부착획득(P <0.05);연합조여기출조치료후비교,PD、SBI、림상부착상실(CAL)、탐진심도、탐진출혈차이유통계학의의(P <0.05)。치료후,연합조화기출조 TNF-α、IL-6급 CRP 수평교대조조명현강저(P <0.05);기출조화연합조치료후혈청중 TNF-α、IL-6급 CRP 수평비교,차이유통계학의의(P <0.05)。결론아주치료화번판술균능강저노년관심병환자상관혈청염성인자 TNF-α、IL-6화 CRP 수평,단상대우아주기출치료,번판술효과경가。
Objective To observe the effect of different periodontal therapies on serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α),interleukin-6(IL-6)and C-reactive protein (CRP)in elderly patients with coronary.Methods Totally 90 elderly patients with severe periodontitis were divided into three groups,the control group performed the treatment of coronary heart disease;the periodontal treatment group performed the treatment of coronary heart disease and periodontal treatment;the combine group per-formed periodontal therapy and flap surgery on the basis of the treatment of coronary heart disease.The obvervational index were compared among three groups.Results All patients′clinical indexes of periodontitis of combination group and basic group has im-proved after treatment,the levels of PD,SBI,CAL,PLI,the percentage of bleeding on probing and probing depth were significantly decreased (P <0.05),and had significant adhesion(P <0.05);the contrast between combination group and basic group,the levels of PD,SBI,CAL,the percentage of bleeding on probing and probing depth had notable difference(P <0.05).All patients′clinical indexes of periodontitis of combination group and basic group had improved after treatment,serum levels of TNF-α,IL-6 and CRP were significantly decreased (P <0.05);the contrast between combination group and basic group,serum levels of TNF-α,IL-6 and CRP have notable difference (P <0.05).Conclusion The periodontal basic therapy and periodontal flap therapy can reduce the ser-um levels of TNF-α,IL-6 and CRP of elderly coronary heart disease (CHD),but compared to the routine medicine maintenance therapy,the effect of periodontal flap therapy is better.