CAJ | 학술논문

目的：分析研究经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性下壁心肌梗死的临床效果。方法急性下壁心肌梗死患者50例，随机分为观察组和对照组。对照组(25例)使用常规溶栓治疗，观察组(25例)实施经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。比较两组疗效。结果两组动脉再通率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)；观察组与对照组住院病死率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)；观察组不良心脏事件发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性下壁心肌梗死疗效可靠，成功率高且并发症少，值得在临床上使用。
목적：분석연구경피관상동맥개입치료급성하벽심기경사적림상효과。방법급성하벽심기경사환자50례，수궤분위관찰조화대조조。대조조(25례)사용상규용전치료，관찰조(25례)실시경피관상동맥개입치료。비교량조료효。결과량조동맥재통솔비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)；관찰조여대조조주원병사솔비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)；관찰조불양심장사건발생솔명현저우대조조(P<0.05)。결론경피관상동맥개입치료급성하벽심기경사료효가고，성공솔고차병발증소，치득재림상상사용。
Objective To study the clinical effect of percutaneous coronary intervention in the treatment of acute inferior myocardial infarction. Methods A total of 50 patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction were randomly divided into observation group and control group. The control group (n=25) received conventional thrombolysis treatment, and the observation group (n=25) was treated by percutaneous coronary intervention. Curative effects were compared between the two groups. Results The difference of arterial recanalization rates between the two groups had statistical significance (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference of hospital mortality between the observation group and control group (P>0.05). The observation group had obviously lower incidence of adverse cardiac events than the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Percutaneous coronary intervention has reliable effect with high success rate and few complications in treating acute inferior myocardial infarction. It is worthy of clinical application.