广州化工
廣州化工
엄주화공
GUANGZHOU CHEMICAL INDUSTRY AND TECHNOLOGY
2015年
4期
168-170
,共3页
腐蚀管道%强度评定%剩余强度
腐蝕管道%彊度評定%剩餘彊度
부식관도%강도평정%잉여강도
corroded pipelines%strength assessment%remaining strength
为了分析对比三种腐蚀管道剩余强度计算准则，通过对 ASME B31G-1984准则、 ASME B31G-2009准则以及RSTRENG准则进行介绍，对比其计算管道剩余强度的异同点，并对一组腐蚀管道数据进行计算，对比计算结果。得出 ASME B31G-2009准则一级评价最为保守， ASME B31G-1984准则保守性次之， RSTRENG准则保守性最低。
為瞭分析對比三種腐蝕管道剩餘彊度計算準則，通過對 ASME B31G-1984準則、 ASME B31G-2009準則以及RSTRENG準則進行介紹，對比其計算管道剩餘彊度的異同點，併對一組腐蝕管道數據進行計算，對比計算結果。得齣 ASME B31G-2009準則一級評價最為保守， ASME B31G-1984準則保守性次之， RSTRENG準則保守性最低。
위료분석대비삼충부식관도잉여강도계산준칙，통과대 ASME B31G-1984준칙、 ASME B31G-2009준칙이급RSTRENG준칙진행개소，대비기계산관도잉여강도적이동점，병대일조부식관도수거진행계산，대비계산결과。득출 ASME B31G-2009준칙일급평개최위보수， ASME B31G-1984준칙보수성차지， RSTRENG준칙보수성최저。
To analysis and compare three kinds of corroded pipelines remaining strength standards, the ASME B31G-1984 standard, ASME B31G-2009 standard and RSTRENG standard were introduced. These three standards were used to calculate the remaining strength of a corroded pipeline. Comparing the results, the conclusion showed that the ASME B31G-2009 level one evaluation standard was most conservative, the ASME B31G-1984 standard was less conservative than ASME B31G-2009 level one evaluation standard, and the RSTRENG standard was the least conservation standard of all.
