中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2015年
5期
57-59
,共3页
经尿道前列腺电切术%TURP%脓尿%菌尿
經尿道前列腺電切術%TURP%膿尿%菌尿
경뇨도전렬선전절술%TURP%농뇨%균뇨
Transurethral resection%TURP%Pyuria%Bacteriuria
目的:观察经尿道前列腺电切(TURP)术后不同时间脓尿、菌尿的发生率及变化规律,为临床抗菌治疗提供指导依据。方法:以本院2010年1月-2014年5月收治的76例前列腺增生症(BPH)患者为研究对象,患者均接受TUPR治疗。记录术后1周,1、2、3个月时的脓尿发生率与菌尿发生率,并对不同时间的发生率进行比较;术后3个月按照脓尿发生情况将病例分为脓尿组与正常组,对两组的前列腺切除体积进行比较。结果:术后1周,1、2、3个月时的脓尿发生率依次为47.4%(36/76)、100%(74/74)、60.3%(41/68)及33.8%(23/68);不同时间菌尿的发生情况依次为:术后1周7.9%(6/76),其中大肠埃希菌3例,铜绿假单胞菌2例,粪肠球菌1例;术后1个月菌尿发生率为9.4%(7/74),其中粪肠球菌3例,大肠埃希菌2例,表皮葡萄球菌2例;术后2个月菌尿发生率为7.4%(5/68),其中大肠埃希菌3例,表皮葡萄球菌1例,口腔链球菌1例;术后3个月菌尿发生率为0。对不同时间的脓尿率及菌尿率进行比较,结果显示不同时间的菌尿发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),脓尿率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。脓尿组的前列腺切除体积为(31.72±9.56)mL,正常组为(23.29±8.16)mL,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:TURP术后均会发生脓尿,且随着时间的延长其发生率逐渐下降,单纯脓尿者与手术创伤中所致炎症反应有关,具自愈性;单纯菌尿者为无症状菌尿或细菌定植,两者均无需使用抗菌药物治疗。
目的:觀察經尿道前列腺電切(TURP)術後不同時間膿尿、菌尿的髮生率及變化規律,為臨床抗菌治療提供指導依據。方法:以本院2010年1月-2014年5月收治的76例前列腺增生癥(BPH)患者為研究對象,患者均接受TUPR治療。記錄術後1週,1、2、3箇月時的膿尿髮生率與菌尿髮生率,併對不同時間的髮生率進行比較;術後3箇月按照膿尿髮生情況將病例分為膿尿組與正常組,對兩組的前列腺切除體積進行比較。結果:術後1週,1、2、3箇月時的膿尿髮生率依次為47.4%(36/76)、100%(74/74)、60.3%(41/68)及33.8%(23/68);不同時間菌尿的髮生情況依次為:術後1週7.9%(6/76),其中大腸埃希菌3例,銅綠假單胞菌2例,糞腸毬菌1例;術後1箇月菌尿髮生率為9.4%(7/74),其中糞腸毬菌3例,大腸埃希菌2例,錶皮葡萄毬菌2例;術後2箇月菌尿髮生率為7.4%(5/68),其中大腸埃希菌3例,錶皮葡萄毬菌1例,口腔鏈毬菌1例;術後3箇月菌尿髮生率為0。對不同時間的膿尿率及菌尿率進行比較,結果顯示不同時間的菌尿髮生率比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),膿尿率比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。膿尿組的前列腺切除體積為(31.72±9.56)mL,正常組為(23.29±8.16)mL,組間比較差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論:TURP術後均會髮生膿尿,且隨著時間的延長其髮生率逐漸下降,單純膿尿者與手術創傷中所緻炎癥反應有關,具自愈性;單純菌尿者為無癥狀菌尿或細菌定植,兩者均無需使用抗菌藥物治療。
목적:관찰경뇨도전렬선전절(TURP)술후불동시간농뇨、균뇨적발생솔급변화규률,위림상항균치료제공지도의거。방법:이본원2010년1월-2014년5월수치적76례전렬선증생증(BPH)환자위연구대상,환자균접수TUPR치료。기록술후1주,1、2、3개월시적농뇨발생솔여균뇨발생솔,병대불동시간적발생솔진행비교;술후3개월안조농뇨발생정황장병례분위농뇨조여정상조,대량조적전렬선절제체적진행비교。결과:술후1주,1、2、3개월시적농뇨발생솔의차위47.4%(36/76)、100%(74/74)、60.3%(41/68)급33.8%(23/68);불동시간균뇨적발생정황의차위:술후1주7.9%(6/76),기중대장애희균3례,동록가단포균2례,분장구균1례;술후1개월균뇨발생솔위9.4%(7/74),기중분장구균3례,대장애희균2례,표피포도구균2례;술후2개월균뇨발생솔위7.4%(5/68),기중대장애희균3례,표피포도구균1례,구강련구균1례;술후3개월균뇨발생솔위0。대불동시간적농뇨솔급균뇨솔진행비교,결과현시불동시간적균뇨발생솔비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),농뇨솔비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。농뇨조적전렬선절제체적위(31.72±9.56)mL,정상조위(23.29±8.16)mL,조간비교차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론:TURP술후균회발생농뇨,차수착시간적연장기발생솔축점하강,단순농뇨자여수술창상중소치염증반응유관,구자유성;단순균뇨자위무증상균뇨혹세균정식,량자균무수사용항균약물치료。
Objective:To observe the incidence,variation and significance of pyuria and bacteriuria of different time periods after TURP and provide guidance for clinical antimicrobial therapy.Method:76 cases of BPH patients admitted to our hospital from January 2010 to May 2014 were selected for the study.Patients were treated with TUPR treatment.The incidences of pyuria and bacteriuria after 1 week,1 month,2 months and 3 months were recorded, and the incidences of different times were compared;the patients were divided into pyuria group and the normal group in accordance with the occurrence of pyuria after three months,and the prostatectomy volume of the two groups were compared.Result:The pyuria incidences after 1 week,1month,2 months and 3 months were sequentially 47.4%(36/76),100%(74/74),60.3%(41/68)and 33.8%(23/68);occurrence of bacteriuria of different times were as follows:after 1 week 7.9%(6/76),including 3 cases of E.coli,2 cases of pseudomonas aeruginosa,1 case of E.faecalis;after 1 month bacteriuria rate was 9.4%(7/74),with 3 cases of Enterococcus faecalis,2 cases of E.coli,2 cases of staphylococcus epidermidis;after 2 months bacteriuria rate was 7.4%(5/68),including 3 cases of E.coli,1 case of staphylococcus epidermidis,1 case of oral streptococci;after 3 months bacteriuria was 0.Pyuria and bacteriuria rates at different times were compared.Result:The incidence of bacteriuria at different times was no significant difference (P>0.05),pyuria rate had statistically significant difference(P<0.05).The prostate resection volume of pyuria group was(31.72±9.56)mL and that of the normal group was(23.29±8.16)mL,the differences between the two groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:After TURP,pyuria decreased over time.Simple pyuria is related to inflammatory reaction caused by surgical trauma and is self-healing;simple bacteriuria is asymptomatic bacteriuria or bacterial colonization.The use of antibiotic therapy is not needed in both cases.