海南医学
海南醫學
해남의학
HAINAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
2015年
4期
529-531
,共3页
方健源%胡淑芬%李秋娴%邹茂贤%谢碧霞
方健源%鬍淑芬%李鞦嫻%鄒茂賢%謝碧霞
방건원%호숙분%리추한%추무현%사벽하
流式技术%外周血%白血病细胞%复发
流式技術%外週血%白血病細胞%複髮
류식기술%외주혈%백혈병세포%복발
Flow cytometry%Peripheral blood%Leukemic cells%Recurrence
目的:探讨多参数流式技术(FCM)检测外周血白血病细胞在急性髓细胞白血病(AML)复发监测中的临床应用价值。方法选择2012年1月至2014年6月我院血液科收治的56例AML患者,于首次诱导化疗结束、巩固化疗6个月、巩固化疗12个月应用FCM定期检测患者外周血标本,同时检测骨髓细胞形态学的变化。MRD≥0.01%为MRD阳性,否则为MRD阴性。AML患者首次诱导化疗结束后外周血MRD水平分为高(MRD≥10-2)、中(10-2<MRD<10-4)、低(MRD≤10-4)三个水平。采用χ2检验方法比较首次诱导化疗结束、巩固化疗6个月、巩固化疗12个月的MRD阳性组和MRD阴性组复发率差异,同时比较首次诱导化疗结束后外周血MRD高、中、低三组复发率差异。结果 FCM检测外周血MRD阳性组在首次诱导化疗结束、巩固化疗6个月、巩固化疗12个月的复发率分别为72.7%、89.3%、93.8%,MRD阴性组分别为25.0%、18.1%、0;MRD阳性组与MRD阴性组相比较,首次诱导化疗结束(χ2=7.240,P=0.007)、巩固化疗6个月(χ2=15.554,P=0.000)、巩固化疗12个月(χ2=19.562,P=0.000)三个时间点的复发率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);首次诱导化疗结束后外周血MRD高水平组的复发率明显高于中水平组(χ2=8.207,P=0.004)、低水平组(χ2=14.667,P=0.000),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。中水平组的复发率与低水平组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.398,P=0.237>0.05)。结论 FCM检测外周血白血病细胞对诊断AML复发及指导个体化治疗有重要意义。
目的:探討多參數流式技術(FCM)檢測外週血白血病細胞在急性髓細胞白血病(AML)複髮鑑測中的臨床應用價值。方法選擇2012年1月至2014年6月我院血液科收治的56例AML患者,于首次誘導化療結束、鞏固化療6箇月、鞏固化療12箇月應用FCM定期檢測患者外週血標本,同時檢測骨髓細胞形態學的變化。MRD≥0.01%為MRD暘性,否則為MRD陰性。AML患者首次誘導化療結束後外週血MRD水平分為高(MRD≥10-2)、中(10-2<MRD<10-4)、低(MRD≤10-4)三箇水平。採用χ2檢驗方法比較首次誘導化療結束、鞏固化療6箇月、鞏固化療12箇月的MRD暘性組和MRD陰性組複髮率差異,同時比較首次誘導化療結束後外週血MRD高、中、低三組複髮率差異。結果 FCM檢測外週血MRD暘性組在首次誘導化療結束、鞏固化療6箇月、鞏固化療12箇月的複髮率分彆為72.7%、89.3%、93.8%,MRD陰性組分彆為25.0%、18.1%、0;MRD暘性組與MRD陰性組相比較,首次誘導化療結束(χ2=7.240,P=0.007)、鞏固化療6箇月(χ2=15.554,P=0.000)、鞏固化療12箇月(χ2=19.562,P=0.000)三箇時間點的複髮率差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05);首次誘導化療結束後外週血MRD高水平組的複髮率明顯高于中水平組(χ2=8.207,P=0.004)、低水平組(χ2=14.667,P=0.000),差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。中水平組的複髮率與低水平組比較差異無統計學意義(χ2=1.398,P=0.237>0.05)。結論 FCM檢測外週血白血病細胞對診斷AML複髮及指導箇體化治療有重要意義。
목적:탐토다삼수류식기술(FCM)검측외주혈백혈병세포재급성수세포백혈병(AML)복발감측중적림상응용개치。방법선택2012년1월지2014년6월아원혈액과수치적56례AML환자,우수차유도화료결속、공고화료6개월、공고화료12개월응용FCM정기검측환자외주혈표본,동시검측골수세포형태학적변화。MRD≥0.01%위MRD양성,부칙위MRD음성。AML환자수차유도화료결속후외주혈MRD수평분위고(MRD≥10-2)、중(10-2<MRD<10-4)、저(MRD≤10-4)삼개수평。채용χ2검험방법비교수차유도화료결속、공고화료6개월、공고화료12개월적MRD양성조화MRD음성조복발솔차이,동시비교수차유도화료결속후외주혈MRD고、중、저삼조복발솔차이。결과 FCM검측외주혈MRD양성조재수차유도화료결속、공고화료6개월、공고화료12개월적복발솔분별위72.7%、89.3%、93.8%,MRD음성조분별위25.0%、18.1%、0;MRD양성조여MRD음성조상비교,수차유도화료결속(χ2=7.240,P=0.007)、공고화료6개월(χ2=15.554,P=0.000)、공고화료12개월(χ2=19.562,P=0.000)삼개시간점적복발솔차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05);수차유도화료결속후외주혈MRD고수평조적복발솔명현고우중수평조(χ2=8.207,P=0.004)、저수평조(χ2=14.667,P=0.000),차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。중수평조적복발솔여저수평조비교차이무통계학의의(χ2=1.398,P=0.237>0.05)。결론 FCM검측외주혈백혈병세포대진단AML복발급지도개체화치료유중요의의。
Objective To investigate the application of multi-parameter flow cytometry (FCM) for detection of peripheral blood leukemic cells in monitoring of recurrence of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods Fifty-six patients with AML from January 2012 to June 2014 in Department of Hematology in our hospital were enrolled. Pe-ripheral blood samples of the patients were detected using FCM regularly after the first induction chemotherapy, 6 months, 12 months of consolidation chemotherapy. Changes in morphology of bone marrow cell were detected. MRD≥0.01%was defined as MRD positive, and MRD<0.01%was defined as MRD negative. MRD levels of AML patients after the first induction chemotherapy were divided into high level (MRD≥10-2), medium level (10-2<MRD<10-4), low level (MRD≤10-4). Chi square test was used to compare the recurrence rates between MRD positive group and MRD negative group after the first induction chemotherapy, 6 months, 12 months of consolidation chemotherapy. At the same time, the recurrence rates were compared between high level, medium level, low level group after the first induction chemotherapy. Results The recurrence rates after the first induction chemotherapy, 6 months, 12 months of consolidation chemotherapy were 72.7%, 89.3%, 93.8%in MRD positive group, 25%, 18.1%, 0%in MRD negative group, with statistically significant difference between the MRD positive group and MRD negative group after induction chemotherapy (χ2=7.240, P=0.007), 6 months of consolidation chemotherapy (χ2=15.554, P=0.000) and 12 months of consolidation chemotherapy (χ2=19.562, P=0.000), P<0.05. After the first induction chemotherapy, the recur-rence rate in MRD high level group was significantly higher than that in the medium level group (χ2=8.207, P=0.004) and low level group (χ2=14.667, P=0.000), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the the recurrence rate between the medium level group and low level group (χ2=1.398, P=0.237>0.05). Conclusion FCM detection of Leukemia cells in peripheral blood has important significance for the diagnosis of recurrent AML and guiding individual treatment.