农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
2015年
3期
215-220
,共6页
贾洪雷%王刚%郭明卓%Dylan Shah%姜鑫铭%赵佳乐
賈洪雷%王剛%郭明卓%Dylan Shah%薑鑫銘%趙佳樂
가홍뢰%왕강%곽명탁%Dylan Shah%강흠명%조가악
机器视觉%图像处理%秸秆%图像识别%玉米植株数量%留高茬%玉米收获机
機器視覺%圖像處理%秸稈%圖像識彆%玉米植株數量%留高茬%玉米收穫機
궤기시각%도상처리%갈간%도상식별%옥미식주수량%류고치%옥미수획궤
computer vision%image processing%straw%image identifying%corn population%high stubble%corn harvester
获得田间的玉米植株数量对于优化不同玉米品种的种植密度有重要意义,玉米植株数量也是计算新玉米品种平均每株产量的重要参数。为了减轻人工获得玉米植株数量的劳动强度,提高数据的准确率,该文利用基于机器视觉的图像处理技术来获得玉米植株数量。被留高茬玉米收获机作业之后的地块,有一定高度的玉米秸秆站立在地表,摄录这样的图像信息可以大大简化图像处理的难度,提高结果的精确度,所以将图像采集装置安装在留高茬玉米收获机之后来获得视频流。后处理过程中,将视频文件分解为图片文件,然后将真彩色的RGB图片文件转化成灰度图像进行图片的配准,再将灰度图像转化为二值图像进行图像分割与边界提取,最后找到玉米秸秆断面的几何中心并进行标记,统计标记结果即获得玉米植株数量。试验结果显示,人工播种与机械播种在图像识别的误差上没有显著差异(P>0.05);机器视觉识别出来的玉米植株数量与实际数量也没有显著差异(P>0.05),其平均误差为6.7%;并且该误差不会随着图像中玉米植株数量的增加而产生积累。该文的设计可以降低机器视觉在识别玉米植株数量过程中的难度,提高图像识别的准确度,更好地服务生产实际问题。
穫得田間的玉米植株數量對于優化不同玉米品種的種植密度有重要意義,玉米植株數量也是計算新玉米品種平均每株產量的重要參數。為瞭減輕人工穫得玉米植株數量的勞動彊度,提高數據的準確率,該文利用基于機器視覺的圖像處理技術來穫得玉米植株數量。被留高茬玉米收穫機作業之後的地塊,有一定高度的玉米秸稈站立在地錶,攝錄這樣的圖像信息可以大大簡化圖像處理的難度,提高結果的精確度,所以將圖像採集裝置安裝在留高茬玉米收穫機之後來穫得視頻流。後處理過程中,將視頻文件分解為圖片文件,然後將真綵色的RGB圖片文件轉化成灰度圖像進行圖片的配準,再將灰度圖像轉化為二值圖像進行圖像分割與邊界提取,最後找到玉米秸稈斷麵的幾何中心併進行標記,統計標記結果即穫得玉米植株數量。試驗結果顯示,人工播種與機械播種在圖像識彆的誤差上沒有顯著差異(P>0.05);機器視覺識彆齣來的玉米植株數量與實際數量也沒有顯著差異(P>0.05),其平均誤差為6.7%;併且該誤差不會隨著圖像中玉米植株數量的增加而產生積纍。該文的設計可以降低機器視覺在識彆玉米植株數量過程中的難度,提高圖像識彆的準確度,更好地服務生產實際問題。
획득전간적옥미식주수량대우우화불동옥미품충적충식밀도유중요의의,옥미식주수량야시계산신옥미품충평균매주산량적중요삼수。위료감경인공획득옥미식주수량적노동강도,제고수거적준학솔,해문이용기우궤기시각적도상처리기술래획득옥미식주수량。피류고치옥미수획궤작업지후적지괴,유일정고도적옥미갈간참립재지표,섭록저양적도상신식가이대대간화도상처리적난도,제고결과적정학도,소이장도상채집장치안장재류고치옥미수획궤지후래획득시빈류。후처리과정중,장시빈문건분해위도편문건,연후장진채색적RGB도편문건전화성회도도상진행도편적배준,재장회도도상전화위이치도상진행도상분할여변계제취,최후조도옥미갈간단면적궤하중심병진행표기,통계표기결과즉획득옥미식주수량。시험결과현시,인공파충여궤계파충재도상식별적오차상몰유현저차이(P>0.05);궤기시각식별출래적옥미식주수량여실제수량야몰유현저차이(P>0.05),기평균오차위6.7%;병차해오차불회수착도상중옥미식주수량적증가이산생적루。해문적설계가이강저궤기시각재식별옥미식주수량과정중적난도,제고도상식별적준학도,경호지복무생산실제문제。
It is very important to count corn population for optimizing plant density of each corn variety, and corn population is also a very important parameter for calculating average yield of each corn plant. Generally speaking, there are three methods to count corn population, which are based on mechanism, photoelectric technology and machine vision separately. In order to decrease the labor intensity and improve the accuracy, image identifying technology is used in this paper to obtain corn population. As corn seedling and weeds have some similarities, and not every corn seedling can grow up to a ripe corn, counting ripe corn’s population is more significant than counting corn seedling’s population. But it is not easy to enter the ripe-corn field for machinery, additionally, corn leaves will overlap and be blown by even slight wind, which will disturb image obtaining. There are also some solutions for the problems mentioned above, for example, corn fields will have a big difference after being operated by high-stubble corn harvesters. A section (300 to 500 mm) of corn stalks will be retained in the field after being harvested by high-stubble corn harvester, and there will be a distinct comparison between the stubble cross-section’ color and other sceneries in the image. Processing images obtained from these fields will decrease the difficulties and improve the accuracy. So image acquisition equipment is mounted on the high-stubble corn harvester. Actually, the visual document obtained from the field is video document at first, and then the video document is decompressed into image. Subsequently, the RGB (red, green, blue) images are converted to gray images for mosaicking. The gray images are converted to binary images in the image segmentation and border extraction section next to image mosaicking section. Although the cross-section of stubble is not a perfect circle, its edge has an obvious feature compared to other objects in the image. At last, a function is used to extract the edge of stubble cross-section, and then the centroid of cross-section is marked. So corn population can be obtained by counting the marks. Experiments were done to test the method and the design in this paper was in autumn of 2013. Experiment results have expressed that there is no significant difference (P<0.05) between artificial seeding and mechanical seeding; and there is also no significant difference (P<0.05) between automated counting and manual counting. The automated count’s mean error is only 6.7%, and this error will not accumulate along with the increasing number of corn plant. The results of artificial count and automated count are linear correlation. The results of linear regression analysis show that the values ofR2 of four experiments are 0.95, 0.90, 0.91 and 0.91, respectively, the slopes of four regression lines are 0.93, 0.91, 1.08 and 0.95 separately, and the intercept of four regression lines are 0.98, 0.97, -0.12 and 0.97 respectively. The design in this paper can reduce the difficulty in identifying corn stalks in images, and improve the image-identifying accuracy at the same time, and hence can better serve the real problems in counting corn population.