化工进展
化工進展
화공진전
CHEMICAL INDUSTRY AND ENGINEERING PROGRESS
2015年
3期
857-862,878
,共7页
贺清尧%蔡凯%晏水平%艾平%王媛媛%张衍林
賀清堯%蔡凱%晏水平%艾平%王媛媛%張衍林
하청요%채개%안수평%애평%왕원원%장연림
沼气提纯%有机胺基氨基酸盐%混合吸收剂%吸收%二氧化碳再生
沼氣提純%有機胺基氨基痠鹽%混閤吸收劑%吸收%二氧化碳再生
소기제순%유궤알기안기산염%혼합흡수제%흡수%이양화탄재생
biogas upgrading%amine based amino acid salt%blended solvent%absorption%CO2 regeneration
在鼓泡式CO2吸收和再生装置中,研究了N-甲基二乙醇胺(MDEA)/乙醇胺(MEA)、MDEA/乙醇胺基甘氨酸(MEAGLY)和MDEA/乙醇胺基肌氨酸(MEASAR)混合吸收剂的沼气CO2吸收及再生特性。结果表明:混合吸收剂的沼气CO2吸收速率随MEA、MEAGLY和MEASAR等添加剂添加量的增加而提高,但再生速率却呈现下降趋势。再生过程中,吸收剂在升温阶段均发生了CO2再生,且混合吸收剂再生效果要优于单一吸收剂。综合考虑CO2吸收速率、再生速率和CO2循环携带量,MDEA与活化剂质量配比为3∶2时所组成的混合吸收剂的沼气CO2吸收-再生综合性能最优。沼气CO2分离成本对比分析显示,与质量分数为30%的MEA相比,总质量分数为30%的MDEA/MEAGLY(3∶2)和MDEA/MEA(3∶2)的CO2分离成本可分别下降约12%和30%,在未来具有替代MEA进行工程应用的潜能。
在鼓泡式CO2吸收和再生裝置中,研究瞭N-甲基二乙醇胺(MDEA)/乙醇胺(MEA)、MDEA/乙醇胺基甘氨痠(MEAGLY)和MDEA/乙醇胺基肌氨痠(MEASAR)混閤吸收劑的沼氣CO2吸收及再生特性。結果錶明:混閤吸收劑的沼氣CO2吸收速率隨MEA、MEAGLY和MEASAR等添加劑添加量的增加而提高,但再生速率卻呈現下降趨勢。再生過程中,吸收劑在升溫階段均髮生瞭CO2再生,且混閤吸收劑再生效果要優于單一吸收劑。綜閤攷慮CO2吸收速率、再生速率和CO2循環攜帶量,MDEA與活化劑質量配比為3∶2時所組成的混閤吸收劑的沼氣CO2吸收-再生綜閤性能最優。沼氣CO2分離成本對比分析顯示,與質量分數為30%的MEA相比,總質量分數為30%的MDEA/MEAGLY(3∶2)和MDEA/MEA(3∶2)的CO2分離成本可分彆下降約12%和30%,在未來具有替代MEA進行工程應用的潛能。
재고포식CO2흡수화재생장치중,연구료N-갑기이을순알(MDEA)/을순알(MEA)、MDEA/을순알기감안산(MEAGLY)화MDEA/을순알기기안산(MEASAR)혼합흡수제적소기CO2흡수급재생특성。결과표명:혼합흡수제적소기CO2흡수속솔수MEA、MEAGLY화MEASAR등첨가제첨가량적증가이제고,단재생속솔각정현하강추세。재생과정중,흡수제재승온계단균발생료CO2재생,차혼합흡수제재생효과요우우단일흡수제。종합고필CO2흡수속솔、재생속솔화CO2순배휴대량,MDEA여활화제질량배비위3∶2시소조성적혼합흡수제적소기CO2흡수-재생종합성능최우。소기CO2분리성본대비분석현시,여질량분수위30%적MEA상비,총질량분수위30%적MDEA/MEAGLY(3∶2)화MDEA/MEA(3∶2)적CO2분리성본가분별하강약12%화30%,재미래구유체대MEA진행공정응용적잠능。
This paper investigated the CO2 absorption performance from biogas and regeneration characteristics using N-methyldiethanolamine-based(MDEA)blended solvents respectively promoted by monoethanolamine(MEA),MEA-based glycinate(MEAGLY) and MEA-based sarcosinate ( MEASAR ) in a bubbling CO2 absorption/regeneration reactor. Results showed that the CO2 absorption rates of blended solvents increased with the adding amount of promoters,but CO2 desorption rates decreased. During the period of temperature increase from the absorption range to regeneration range,all the CO2-rich solvents were regenerated,and the blended solvents performed better than the single solvents in CO2 regeneration efficiency. In addition,when mass ratio of MDEA to promoter was 3∶2 in the blended solvents,the absorption-regeneration performances were optimal. CO2 removal costs from biogas of different absorbents were also assessed and compared. Compared to the single MEA with 30%mass fraction,the blended solvents,MDEA/MEAGLY and MDEA/MEA in which the total mass fraction was 30%and the ratio of MDEA to MEAGLY or MEA was 3﹕2 had the lower CO2 removal costs by about 12%and 30%,respectively. So MDEA/MEAGLY and MDEA/MEA might be the promising alternatives to replace MEA in the future.