图书馆
圖書館
도서관
LIBRARY
2015年
3期
27-31
,共5页
OA出版合同%著作权补遗协议%功能%内涵
OA齣版閤同%著作權補遺協議%功能%內涵
OA출판합동%저작권보유협의%공능%내함
OA publishing contract%Copyright supplement agreement%Function%Intention
印刷时期的格式出版合同沿用于OA出版，已不能成功解决著作权问题，导致补遗协议功能强化，成为作者保留关键权利的法律工具，这与合同法的原则不符。 OA出版中，出版者与作者只有平等、公平地处理著作权转让问题，补遗协议的功能才能得以准确界定，内涵才能得以适当调整，才有利于作者、出版者、图书馆等使用者利益平衡。
印刷時期的格式齣版閤同沿用于OA齣版，已不能成功解決著作權問題，導緻補遺協議功能彊化，成為作者保留關鍵權利的法律工具，這與閤同法的原則不符。 OA齣版中，齣版者與作者隻有平等、公平地處理著作權轉讓問題，補遺協議的功能纔能得以準確界定，內涵纔能得以適噹調整，纔有利于作者、齣版者、圖書館等使用者利益平衡。
인쇄시기적격식출판합동연용우OA출판，이불능성공해결저작권문제，도치보유협의공능강화，성위작자보류관건권리적법률공구，저여합동법적원칙불부。 OA출판중，출판자여작자지유평등、공평지처리저작권전양문제，보유협의적공능재능득이준학계정，내함재능득이괄당조정，재유리우작자、출판자、도서관등사용자이익평형。
The format publishing contract in the printing period extended to OA publishing has not been able to successfully solve copyright problem. So the function of supplement agreement is strengthen and becomes legal instruments that the authors retain key rights, which does not match with the principle of contract law. For OA publishing, only publishers and authors equally, fairly treat the transfer of copyright, can the function of supplement agreement be defined, and the intention can be appropriately adjusted, which is conducive to balance of interests of the authors, publishers, libraries and other users .
