山东医药
山東醫藥
산동의약
SHANDONG MEDICAL JOURNAL
2015年
7期
23-25
,共3页
王凯%蒋国民%田丰%李绍钦%贾中芝%恽文伟
王凱%蔣國民%田豐%李紹欽%賈中芝%惲文偉
왕개%장국민%전봉%리소흠%가중지%운문위
高血压%动脉粥样硬化%肾动脉狭窄%经皮腔内肾动脉成形术%经皮肾动脉支架置入术
高血壓%動脈粥樣硬化%腎動脈狹窄%經皮腔內腎動脈成形術%經皮腎動脈支架置入術
고혈압%동맥죽양경화%신동맥협착%경피강내신동맥성형술%경피신동맥지가치입술
hypertension%atherosclerosis%renal arterial stenosis%percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty%per-cutaneous transluminal renal artery angioplasty and stenting
目的:观察高血压合并动脉粥样硬化性肾动脉狭窄( ARAS)老年患者经皮腔内治疗的效果及安全性。方法45例老年高血压合并ARAS患者,采用经皮腔内治疗,术后随访12个月,观察治疗前后患者血压、降压药物种类、肾功能变化情况以及肾动脉支架通畅情况。结果45例患者共51支肾动脉均成功完成经皮腔内治疗。术后5 d,患者收缩压为(157.78±12.36)mmHg、舒张压为(94.87±6.12)mmHg,血肌酐为(161.15±11.37)μmol/L,舒张压与术前比较,P<0.05;术后6个月时分别为(145.64±11.57) mmHg、(77.42±7.63) mmHg、(159.18±13.45)μmol/L,收缩压及舒张压与术前比较,P均<0.05;术后12个月时分别为(142.36±9.79) mmHg、(74.97±8.82) mmHg、(160.86±9.73)μmol/L,收缩压及舒张压与术前比较,P均<0.05。患者服用降压药物种类术前为(2.96±1.07)种,术后为(1.80±0.23)种,两者比较,P<0.05。所有患者均未出现严重并发症,4例患者因出现肾动脉支架再狭窄再次行经皮腔内肾动脉成形术。结论经皮腔内成形术治疗老年高血压合并 ARAS效果好且安全。
目的:觀察高血壓閤併動脈粥樣硬化性腎動脈狹窄( ARAS)老年患者經皮腔內治療的效果及安全性。方法45例老年高血壓閤併ARAS患者,採用經皮腔內治療,術後隨訪12箇月,觀察治療前後患者血壓、降壓藥物種類、腎功能變化情況以及腎動脈支架通暢情況。結果45例患者共51支腎動脈均成功完成經皮腔內治療。術後5 d,患者收縮壓為(157.78±12.36)mmHg、舒張壓為(94.87±6.12)mmHg,血肌酐為(161.15±11.37)μmol/L,舒張壓與術前比較,P<0.05;術後6箇月時分彆為(145.64±11.57) mmHg、(77.42±7.63) mmHg、(159.18±13.45)μmol/L,收縮壓及舒張壓與術前比較,P均<0.05;術後12箇月時分彆為(142.36±9.79) mmHg、(74.97±8.82) mmHg、(160.86±9.73)μmol/L,收縮壓及舒張壓與術前比較,P均<0.05。患者服用降壓藥物種類術前為(2.96±1.07)種,術後為(1.80±0.23)種,兩者比較,P<0.05。所有患者均未齣現嚴重併髮癥,4例患者因齣現腎動脈支架再狹窄再次行經皮腔內腎動脈成形術。結論經皮腔內成形術治療老年高血壓閤併 ARAS效果好且安全。
목적:관찰고혈압합병동맥죽양경화성신동맥협착( ARAS)노년환자경피강내치료적효과급안전성。방법45례노년고혈압합병ARAS환자,채용경피강내치료,술후수방12개월,관찰치료전후환자혈압、강압약물충류、신공능변화정황이급신동맥지가통창정황。결과45례환자공51지신동맥균성공완성경피강내치료。술후5 d,환자수축압위(157.78±12.36)mmHg、서장압위(94.87±6.12)mmHg,혈기항위(161.15±11.37)μmol/L,서장압여술전비교,P<0.05;술후6개월시분별위(145.64±11.57) mmHg、(77.42±7.63) mmHg、(159.18±13.45)μmol/L,수축압급서장압여술전비교,P균<0.05;술후12개월시분별위(142.36±9.79) mmHg、(74.97±8.82) mmHg、(160.86±9.73)μmol/L,수축압급서장압여술전비교,P균<0.05。환자복용강압약물충류술전위(2.96±1.07)충,술후위(1.80±0.23)충,량자비교,P<0.05。소유환자균미출현엄중병발증,4례환자인출현신동맥지가재협착재차행경피강내신동맥성형술。결론경피강내성형술치료노년고혈압합병 ARAS효과호차안전。
Objective To observe the safety and effectiveness of endovascular interventional treatment for atherosclerot -ic renal artery stenosis ( ARAS) in old patients with hypertension .Methods Endovascular interventional treatments were performed in 45 old patients with hypertension combined with ARAS ( luminal narrowing≥70%) .The therapeutic effects were analyzed by means of blood pressure , types of hypotensors , renal function changes before and after therapy in average 12-month follow-up after operation .Results The percutaneous transluminal interventional treatment was successfully per -formed in 51 renal arteries of 45 patients.Five days after intervention , the systolic blood pressure decreased to (157.78 ± 12.36) mmHg, diastolic blood pressure decreased to (94.87 ±6.12) mmHg, and serum creatine ( Scr) was (161.15 ± 11.37)μmol/L.There was significant difference in the diastolic blood pressure as compared with that before treatment (P<0.05).Six months after intervention, the systolic blood pressure decreased to (145.64 ±11.57) mmHg, the diastolic blood pressure decreased to (77.42 ±7.63) mmHg, and Scr was (159.18 ±13.45)μmol/L.There were significant differences in the systolic and diastolic blood pressure as compared with that before treatment (all P<0.05).During the follow-up period for 12 months, the systolic blood pressure decreased to (142.36 ±9.79) mmHg, the diastolic blood pressure decreased to (74.97 ±8.82) mmHg, and Scr was (160.86 ±9.73) μmol/L.There were significant differences in the systolic and dias-tolic blood pressure as compared with that before treatment (all P<0.05).The number of hypotensors reduced from (2.96 ± 1.07) to (1.80 ±0.23) (P<0.05).All patients did not have serious complications , and 4 patients due to renal artery stent restenosis were performed with percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty again .Conclusion The medium-term results of endovascular interventional treatment for ARAS in old patients with hypertension are safe and satisfactory .