CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对比分析加味玉屏风颗粒与西替利嗪治疗慢性湿疹的疗效与安全性。方法：根据治疗方案将2010年7月-2013年7月我院收治的135例慢性湿疹患者分为观察组与对照组，观察组患者71例，接受加味玉屏风颗粒治疗，对照组患者64例，接受西替利嗪治疗。治疗结束后，所有患者均接受6个月的随访。结果：①两组患者治疗效果相比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。②观察组患者不良反应发生率显著低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。③观察组患者复发率显著低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：加味玉屏风颗粒与西替利嗪治疗慢性湿疹的疗效相当，但是前者的不良反应发生率与复发率低，值得临床推广应用。
목적：대비분석가미옥병풍과립여서체리진치료만성습진적료효여안전성。방법：근거치료방안장2010년7월-2013년7월아원수치적135례만성습진환자분위관찰조여대조조，관찰조환자71례，접수가미옥병풍과립치료，대조조환자64례，접수서체리진치료。치료결속후，소유환자균접수6개월적수방。결과：①량조환자치료효과상비차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）。②관찰조환자불량반응발생솔현저저우대조조，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。③관찰조환자복발솔현저저우대조조，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론：가미옥병풍과립여서체리진치료만성습진적료효상당，단시전자적불량반응발생솔여복발솔저，치득림상추엄응용。
Objective:To analyze contradistinction of Jiawei Yupingfeng granule and cetirizine on chronic eczema. Methods:135 patients in our hospital from July 2010 to July 2013 were randomly divided into two group, the observation group (71 cases) was given Jiawei Yupingfeng granule;the control group (64 cases) was given cetirizine. After treatment, all patients were followed up in 6 months. Results: I.Treatment efficacy in two group was compared, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). II.The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation was lower, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). III.Recurrence rate in the observation was lower, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Jiawei Yupingfeng granule and cetirizine showed obvious effects on chronic eczema, but Jiawei Yupingfeng granule was better, and worthy of promotion.