CAJ | 학술논문

目的：观察评价SEMINAR教学法在临床普外科教学中的应用实施方法和效果。方法将46名至普外科实习五年制本科生分为传统组与实验组各23组，前者给予传统讲学模式，后者应用Seminar模式，对比考核结果，并开始Seminar模式评价。结果教学后，传统组与实验组CTDI-CV评分高于教学前，实验组（329±35）分高于传统组（308±31）分，实验组理论、操作考核分分别为（84±13）分、（88±10）分高于传统组（73±18）分、（78±13）分，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；Seminar教学学生多倾向于正面。结论 SEMINAR教学法在临床普外科教学中比传统教学法的优势，而且能加强学员之间的沟通和合作能力。
목적：관찰평개SEMINAR교학법재림상보외과교학중적응용실시방법화효과。방법장46명지보외과실습오년제본과생분위전통조여실험조각23조，전자급여전통강학모식，후자응용Seminar모식，대비고핵결과，병개시Seminar모식평개。결과교학후，전통조여실험조CTDI-CV평분고우교학전，실험조（329±35）분고우전통조（308±31）분，실험조이론、조작고핵분분별위（84±13）분、（88±10）분고우전통조（73±18）분、（78±13）분，차이구유통계학의의（P＜0.05）；Seminar교학학생다경향우정면。결론 SEMINAR교학법재림상보외과교학중비전통교학법적우세，이차능가강학원지간적구통화합작능력。
Objective To observe implementation method and effect evaluation of SEMINAR teaching method in clinical teaching in Department of general surgery. Methods 46 students were divided into traditional group and experimental group, the former for traditional lecturing model, the latter for Seminar model. Results After teaching, the traditional CTDI-CV group and experimental group score were higher than before the teaching, the experimental group (329 ±35) was higher than the traditional group (308 ±31), the experimental group theory and skills examination hours respectively (84±13), (88 ±10) were higher than traditional group (73 ±18), (78 ±13), with significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion The Seminar teaching method of traditional teaching method in clinical teaching in Department of general surgery has its adventages.