华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)
華中科技大學學報(社會科學版)
화중과기대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION)
2015年
2期
24-29
,共6页
直%亲亲互隐%孝道
直%親親互隱%孝道
직%친친호은%효도
right%concealment of wrong doing among family members%filial piety
最近十年,哲学界关于儒家“亲亲互隐”的争论涉及的问题日渐深入,大多将“亲亲互隐”视为义务性的伦理原则,“子为父隐”与“直在其中矣”的“直”结合起来解读非常必要,而割裂“隐”与“直”的关系阐述文本,并不能反映孔子的真实思想。文中在详细阐述“直”的基础上,以证明孔子并非将“亲亲互隐”视为一个绝对化、普遍化的原则,而是表达了一个具体情境中他认同的特殊关系人———儿子———的选择。
最近十年,哲學界關于儒傢“親親互隱”的爭論涉及的問題日漸深入,大多將“親親互隱”視為義務性的倫理原則,“子為父隱”與“直在其中矣”的“直”結閤起來解讀非常必要,而割裂“隱”與“直”的關繫闡述文本,併不能反映孔子的真實思想。文中在詳細闡述“直”的基礎上,以證明孔子併非將“親親互隱”視為一箇絕對化、普遍化的原則,而是錶達瞭一箇具體情境中他認同的特殊關繫人———兒子———的選擇。
최근십년,철학계관우유가“친친호은”적쟁론섭급적문제일점심입,대다장“친친호은”시위의무성적윤리원칙,“자위부은”여“직재기중의”적“직”결합기래해독비상필요,이할렬“은”여“직”적관계천술문본,병불능반영공자적진실사상。문중재상세천술“직”적기출상,이증명공자병비장“친친호은”시위일개절대화、보편화적원칙,이시표체료일개구체정경중타인동적특수관계인———인자———적선택。
In the last decade,the study is profoundly increasingly about “fathers and sons to conceal each other's misconduct”as an academic debate in philosophy.As far as I am concerned,we cannot separate-ly explain the “concealment”and “upright”in the Analects.Guo Qiyong made an excessive interpretation that fathers and sons’concealment to each other is an ethical principle.However,the Analects 13:18 does not hold that fathers and sons to conceal each other's misconduct as an ethical principle,the “upright”is nec-essary rather than sufficient for the “concealment”,and it is an expression form of filial piety.Throughout Confucius’explanation of uprightness in the Analects,he does not give an universal principle,but just offer persons different opinions based on specific relationships and situations.