中国临床药理学杂志
中國臨床藥理學雜誌
중국림상약이학잡지
THE CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
2015年
4期
256-258
,共3页
苏敏%商振球%梁凌峰%兰晓琳
囌敏%商振毬%樑凌峰%蘭曉琳
소민%상진구%량릉봉%란효림
慢性乙型病毒性肝炎%阿德福韦%恩替卡韦%临床研究
慢性乙型病毒性肝炎%阿德福韋%恩替卡韋%臨床研究
만성을형병독성간염%아덕복위%은체잡위%림상연구
chronic hepatitis B%adefovir%entecavir%clinical study
目的:评价阿德福韦对比恩替卡韦治疗慢性乙型病毒性肝炎(乙肝)的临床疗效及安全性。方法86例慢性乙肝患者随机分为阿德福韦组(41例)和恩替卡韦组(45例),分别口服阿德福韦0.5 mg? d-1和恩替卡韦10 mg? d-1,疗程均为12个月。比较2组患者治疗前后乙肝病毒( HBV) DNA载量、病毒转阴率及药品不良反应。结果治疗12个月后,阿德福韦组与恩替卡韦组患者HBV DNA病毒载量[(4.21±0.71) vs (4.01±0.68)log10 copies? mL-1]较治疗前均明显降低,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。2组HBV DNA转阴率及谷丙转氨酶(ALT)正常率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组患者不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。结论阿德福韦与恩替卡韦治疗慢性乙肝均有较好的临床疗效,且不良反应轻微。
目的:評價阿德福韋對比恩替卡韋治療慢性乙型病毒性肝炎(乙肝)的臨床療效及安全性。方法86例慢性乙肝患者隨機分為阿德福韋組(41例)和恩替卡韋組(45例),分彆口服阿德福韋0.5 mg? d-1和恩替卡韋10 mg? d-1,療程均為12箇月。比較2組患者治療前後乙肝病毒( HBV) DNA載量、病毒轉陰率及藥品不良反應。結果治療12箇月後,阿德福韋組與恩替卡韋組患者HBV DNA病毒載量[(4.21±0.71) vs (4.01±0.68)log10 copies? mL-1]較治療前均明顯降低,差異有統計學意義( P<0.05)。2組HBV DNA轉陰率及穀丙轉氨酶(ALT)正常率差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。2組患者不良反應髮生率差異無統計學意義( P>0.05)。結論阿德福韋與恩替卡韋治療慢性乙肝均有較好的臨床療效,且不良反應輕微。
목적:평개아덕복위대비은체잡위치료만성을형병독성간염(을간)적림상료효급안전성。방법86례만성을간환자수궤분위아덕복위조(41례)화은체잡위조(45례),분별구복아덕복위0.5 mg? d-1화은체잡위10 mg? d-1,료정균위12개월。비교2조환자치료전후을간병독( HBV) DNA재량、병독전음솔급약품불량반응。결과치료12개월후,아덕복위조여은체잡위조환자HBV DNA병독재량[(4.21±0.71) vs (4.01±0.68)log10 copies? mL-1]교치료전균명현강저,차이유통계학의의( P<0.05)。2조HBV DNA전음솔급곡병전안매(ALT)정상솔차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。2조환자불량반응발생솔차이무통계학의의( P>0.05)。결론아덕복위여은체잡위치료만성을간균유교호적림상료효,차불량반응경미。
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of adefovir and entecavir in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B ( CHB ) . Methods Eighty -six patients with CHB were recruited from 2012 to 2013 in our hospital and randomly divided into adefovir group ( n=41 ) and entecavir group ( n=45 ) .Patients in the adefovir group and ente-cavir group were given adefovir 0.5 mg? d-1 , po and entecavir 10 mg? d-1 , po, respectively.The treatment lasted for 12 months.The he-patitis B virus( HBV) DNA, HBV negative rate and adverse drug reac-tions in two groups were compared before and after treatment.Results After 12 months treatment, the HBV DNA were significantly decreased in both groups [ ( 4.21 ±0.71 ) vs ( 4.01 ±0.68 ) log10 copies? mL-1 ] with statistical difference ( P <0.05 ) , but no statistical difference in HBV negative rate and ALT normal rate was found between the two groups ( P>0.05 ) .Conclusion Significant clinical efficacy of both adefovir and entecavir was found in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, with less adverse drug reactions.