中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2015年
5期
593-595
,共3页
汪媛媛%郭涛%刘琼%蔡蕊%段培蓓
汪媛媛%郭濤%劉瓊%蔡蕊%段培蓓
왕원원%곽도%류경%채예%단배배
急诊科%心肺复苏%培训%新护士%费茨动作技能形成理论
急診科%心肺複囌%培訓%新護士%費茨動作技能形成理論
급진과%심폐복소%배훈%신호사%비자동작기능형성이론
Emergency Department%Cardiopulmonary resuscitation%Training%New nurses%Fitts′motor skills formation theory
目的:探讨基于动作技能理论的路径在急诊新护士的心肺复苏术( CPR)培训方法中的应用效果,以提高急诊新护士的急救技能水平。方法将2010年7月—2013年3月136名急诊科新护士,随机分为对照组和观察组,对照组采用临床常规方法实施培训,观察组应用基于动作技能理论的路径实施培训。比较两组培训前、培训1,2,6 d、1个月后的CPR考核成绩。结果两组急诊新护士培训前CPR考核成绩差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。培训1,2,6 d、1个月后,观察组考核成绩分别为(92.57±2.17),(86.14±3.09),(94.85±2.00),(95.16±2.08)分,对照组分别为(83.13±2.00),(80.14±3.12),(87.46±2.11),(90.53±3.00)分,差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为2.431,3.106,3.467,2.431;P<0.01)。观察组护士复苏质量考核优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论运用基于动作技能形成理论的培训路径,能更好地提高急诊科新护士的CPR技能。
目的:探討基于動作技能理論的路徑在急診新護士的心肺複囌術( CPR)培訓方法中的應用效果,以提高急診新護士的急救技能水平。方法將2010年7月—2013年3月136名急診科新護士,隨機分為對照組和觀察組,對照組採用臨床常規方法實施培訓,觀察組應用基于動作技能理論的路徑實施培訓。比較兩組培訓前、培訓1,2,6 d、1箇月後的CPR攷覈成績。結果兩組急診新護士培訓前CPR攷覈成績差異無統計學意義(P >0.05)。培訓1,2,6 d、1箇月後,觀察組攷覈成績分彆為(92.57±2.17),(86.14±3.09),(94.85±2.00),(95.16±2.08)分,對照組分彆為(83.13±2.00),(80.14±3.12),(87.46±2.11),(90.53±3.00)分,差異均有統計學意義(t值分彆為2.431,3.106,3.467,2.431;P<0.01)。觀察組護士複囌質量攷覈優于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01)。結論運用基于動作技能形成理論的培訓路徑,能更好地提高急診科新護士的CPR技能。
목적:탐토기우동작기능이론적로경재급진신호사적심폐복소술( CPR)배훈방법중적응용효과,이제고급진신호사적급구기능수평。방법장2010년7월—2013년3월136명급진과신호사,수궤분위대조조화관찰조,대조조채용림상상규방법실시배훈,관찰조응용기우동작기능이론적로경실시배훈。비교량조배훈전、배훈1,2,6 d、1개월후적CPR고핵성적。결과량조급진신호사배훈전CPR고핵성적차이무통계학의의(P >0.05)。배훈1,2,6 d、1개월후,관찰조고핵성적분별위(92.57±2.17),(86.14±3.09),(94.85±2.00),(95.16±2.08)분,대조조분별위(83.13±2.00),(80.14±3.12),(87.46±2.11),(90.53±3.00)분,차이균유통계학의의(t치분별위2.431,3.106,3.467,2.431;P<0.01)。관찰조호사복소질량고핵우우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01)。결론운용기우동작기능형성이론적배훈로경,능경호지제고급진과신호사적CPR기능。
Objective To explore the cardiopulmonary resuscitation ( CPR) training method of new nurses of Emergency Department, in order to rapidly improve the level of new nurses in emergency first aid skills. Methods From July 2010 to March 2013, a total of 136 people were randomly divided into control group and experimental group. The control group was given traditional clinical training. The application of the theory of motor skills was applied in experimental group. The training results were compared before training and 1, 2, 6 days and 1 month after training. Results There was no significant difference between the control group and the experimental group before training (P >0. 05). 1,2,6 days and 1 month after training the scores of the experimental group were (92. 57 ± 2. 17), (86. 14 ± 3. 09), (94. 85 ± 2. 00) and (95. 16 ± 2. 08), respectively, those scores of the control group were (83. 13 ± 2. 00), (80. 14 ± 3. 12), (87. 46 ± 2. 11) and (90.53 ±3.00). There were significant differences between two groups (t =2. 431,3. 106,3. 467,2. 431, respectively;P<0. 01). The CPR quality was significantly better of the experimental group than that of control group (P<0. 01). Conclusions Compared to traditional clinical teaching method, applying motor skill theory can improve CPR skills of the new nurses in the Emergency Department.