中国当代医药
中國噹代醫藥
중국당대의약
PERSON
2015年
3期
90-91,96
,共3页
超声造影%增强CT%肝恶性病变%ROC曲线
超聲造影%增彊CT%肝噁性病變%ROC麯線
초성조영%증강CT%간악성병변%ROC곡선
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography%Contrast-enhanced computed tomography%Liver malignant lesions%ROC curve
目的：通过ROC曲线比较超声造影与增强CT对肝脏恶性病变的诊断价值。方法对60例肝局灶性占位患者进行超声造影和增强CT检查,做出5级法诊断院是、可能是、不清楚、可能不是、不是。所有患者均经病理确诊。用ROC曲线对两种方法进行分析。结果超声造影诊断肝脏恶性病变的ROC曲线下面积为0.944,增强CT为0.962,两种方法比较,差异无统计学意义(P跃0.05)。结论超声造影与增强CT对肝脏恶性病变均具有较好的诊断价值。
目的：通過ROC麯線比較超聲造影與增彊CT對肝髒噁性病變的診斷價值。方法對60例肝跼竈性佔位患者進行超聲造影和增彊CT檢查,做齣5級法診斷院是、可能是、不清楚、可能不是、不是。所有患者均經病理確診。用ROC麯線對兩種方法進行分析。結果超聲造影診斷肝髒噁性病變的ROC麯線下麵積為0.944,增彊CT為0.962,兩種方法比較,差異無統計學意義(P躍0.05)。結論超聲造影與增彊CT對肝髒噁性病變均具有較好的診斷價值。
목적：통과ROC곡선비교초성조영여증강CT대간장악성병변적진단개치。방법대60례간국조성점위환자진행초성조영화증강CT검사,주출5급법진단원시、가능시、불청초、가능불시、불시。소유환자균경병리학진。용ROC곡선대량충방법진행분석。결과초성조영진단간장악성병변적ROC곡선하면적위0.944,증강CT위0.962,량충방법비교,차이무통계학의의(P약0.05)。결론초성조영여증강CT대간장악성병변균구유교호적진단개치。
Objective To compare the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and contrast-en-hanced computed tomography (CECT) on liver malignant lesion through ROC curve. Methods 60 cases of hepatic focal le-sions were given CECT and CEUS examination.Five-level diagnosis was made:yes,maybe,unclear, may not and no.All pa-tients were diagnosed by pathology.ROC curve could be used to analyze the two methods. Results The ROC curve area of CEUS and CECT diagnosis is 0.944 and 0.962 respectively,and there is no statistic difference between them (P>0.05). Conclusion CEUS has good diagnosis efficiency for liver malignant lesion and has the equal efficiency with that of CECT.
