CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较支气管舒张试验的两种选择标准及阳性率结果，对支气管哮喘诊治的意义。方法以FEV1<70%预计值为标准选择行支气管舒张试验的患者62例，作为对照组；以FEV1%(一秒率)<75%为标准选择行支气管舒张试验的病人有88例，作为实验组，所有入选患者行支气管舒张试验，分别统计入选率及阳性率。结果对照组入选率为31.0%，阳性率为15.0%；实验组入选率为44.0%，阳性率为23.5%，两组入选率及阳性率比较有显著差异(P>0．05)。结论以FEV1%<75%为选择支气管舒张试验的标准，可以更多的发现阳性患者，更及时的确诊，同时也为哮喘的临床诊断和研究带来积极意义。
목적：비교지기관서장시험적량충선택표준급양성솔결과，대지기관효천진치적의의。방법이FEV1<70%예계치위표준선택행지기관서장시험적환자62례，작위대조조；이FEV1%(일초솔)<75%위표준선택행지기관서장시험적병인유88례，작위실험조，소유입선환자행지기관서장시험，분별통계입선솔급양성솔。결과대조조입선솔위31.0%，양성솔위15.0%；실험조입선솔위44.0%，양성솔위23.5%，량조입선솔급양성솔비교유현저차이(P>0．05)。결론이FEV1%<75%위선택지기관서장시험적표준，가이경다적발현양성환자，경급시적학진，동시야위효천적림상진단화연구대래적겁의의。
Objective To compare two selection standards and positive results of bronchial dilation test. Methods 62 patients with FEV1 <70% of expected value in bronchial dilation test were selected as the control group, and 88 patients with FEV1% ( forced expiratory flow in one second) <75% in bronchial dilation test were se-lected as the experimental group. Bronchial dilation tests were carried out in all selected patients in order to count the selected rate and positive rate, respectively. Results The selected rate of the control group was 31. 0% and the positive rate was 15. 0%. The selected rate of the experimental group was 44. 0%, and the positive rate was 23. 5%. Conclusion If FEV1 <75% is set as the selection standard, more positive patients can be selected and timely diag-nosis, which is positive for the clinical diagnosis and research of asthma.