临床肺科杂志
臨床肺科雜誌
림상폐과잡지
JOUNAL OF CLINICAL PULMONARY MEDICINE
2015年
4期
695-697
,共3页
一氧化碳中毒%氧疗%临床疗效
一氧化碳中毒%氧療%臨床療效
일양화탄중독%양료%림상료효
carbon monoxide poisoning%oxygen therapy%clinical effect
目的:探讨对一氧化碳中毒患者采用不同氧疗方法治疗的临床疗效。方法对我院2011年1月至2013年4月收治的64例一氧化碳中毒患者随机分为观察组和对照组各32例,两组采用常规的抗感染、水电解质平衡、呼吸道护理措施进行治疗,观察组在常规治疗基础上加用高氧液静脉液体给氧治疗,对照组在常规治疗的基础上加高压氧舱进行治疗。比较两组患者治疗20天后的临床疗效、超氧化物歧化酶( SOD)、碳氧血红蛋白( HBCO)、TNF-ɑ、IL-6及治疗后遗症的差异。结果治疗前两组患者的SOD、HBCO、TNF-ɑ、IL-6比较两组间差异不具有统计学意义( P>0.05);治疗后两组的SOD、HBCO、TNF-ɑ、IL-6与治疗前进行组内比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗后两组各种临床指标均显著好转;治疗后两组间SOD、HBCO、比较差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05),TNF-ɑ、IL-6比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗20天后,两组的疗效分布、总有效率比较差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组病死率比较差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05),两组迟发型脑病、平均昏迷时间比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组的迟发型脑病、平均昏迷时间均显著低于对照组。结论对一氧化碳中毒患者采用高氧液静脉液体给氧治疗与高压氧舱进行治疗的疗效相当,但是治疗后后遗症发生率更低。
目的:探討對一氧化碳中毒患者採用不同氧療方法治療的臨床療效。方法對我院2011年1月至2013年4月收治的64例一氧化碳中毒患者隨機分為觀察組和對照組各32例,兩組採用常規的抗感染、水電解質平衡、呼吸道護理措施進行治療,觀察組在常規治療基礎上加用高氧液靜脈液體給氧治療,對照組在常規治療的基礎上加高壓氧艙進行治療。比較兩組患者治療20天後的臨床療效、超氧化物歧化酶( SOD)、碳氧血紅蛋白( HBCO)、TNF-ɑ、IL-6及治療後遺癥的差異。結果治療前兩組患者的SOD、HBCO、TNF-ɑ、IL-6比較兩組間差異不具有統計學意義( P>0.05);治療後兩組的SOD、HBCO、TNF-ɑ、IL-6與治療前進行組內比較差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05),治療後兩組各種臨床指標均顯著好轉;治療後兩組間SOD、HBCO、比較差異不具有統計學意義(P>0.05),TNF-ɑ、IL-6比較差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。治療20天後,兩組的療效分佈、總有效率比較差異不具有統計學意義(P>0.05)。兩組病死率比較差異不具有統計學意義(P>0.05),兩組遲髮型腦病、平均昏迷時間比較差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05),觀察組的遲髮型腦病、平均昏迷時間均顯著低于對照組。結論對一氧化碳中毒患者採用高氧液靜脈液體給氧治療與高壓氧艙進行治療的療效相噹,但是治療後後遺癥髮生率更低。
목적:탐토대일양화탄중독환자채용불동양료방법치료적림상료효。방법대아원2011년1월지2013년4월수치적64례일양화탄중독환자수궤분위관찰조화대조조각32례,량조채용상규적항감염、수전해질평형、호흡도호리조시진행치료,관찰조재상규치료기출상가용고양액정맥액체급양치료,대조조재상규치료적기출상가고압양창진행치료。비교량조환자치료20천후적림상료효、초양화물기화매( SOD)、탄양혈홍단백( HBCO)、TNF-ɑ、IL-6급치료후유증적차이。결과치료전량조환자적SOD、HBCO、TNF-ɑ、IL-6비교량조간차이불구유통계학의의( P>0.05);치료후량조적SOD、HBCO、TNF-ɑ、IL-6여치료전진행조내비교차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05),치료후량조각충림상지표균현저호전;치료후량조간SOD、HBCO、비교차이불구유통계학의의(P>0.05),TNF-ɑ、IL-6비교차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。치료20천후,량조적료효분포、총유효솔비교차이불구유통계학의의(P>0.05)。량조병사솔비교차이불구유통계학의의(P>0.05),량조지발형뇌병、평균혼미시간비교차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05),관찰조적지발형뇌병、평균혼미시간균현저저우대조조。결론대일양화탄중독환자채용고양액정맥액체급양치료여고압양창진행치료적료효상당,단시치료후후유증발생솔경저。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of different oxygen therapies in the treatment of car-bon monoxide poisoning. Methods 64 patients with CO poisoning in our hospital from 2011 January to 2013 April were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group, 32 cases in each group. All patients were given conventional anti-infection, water and electrolyte balance, measures of respiratory tract nursing. The observa-tion group was additionally treated with high oxygen liquid intravenous therapy, and the control group was given hy-perbaric oxygen treatment. The clinical efficacy was compared between the two groups. Results Before the treat-ment, there was no significant difference in SOD, HBCO, TNF-alpha and IL-6 between the two groups (P>0. 05). After the treatment, the levels of SOD, HBCO, TNF-alpha and IL-6 were all improved (P<0. 05). There were sig-nificant differences in IL-6 and TNF-alphathe between the two groups, but there was no significant difference in SOD and HBCO (P>0. 05). 20 days after the treatment, there was no obvious difference in total efficiency and mortality (P>0. 05), but there were statistical significance in delayed encephalopathy and average time of coma (P<0. 05). The incidence of delayed encephalopathy and the average time of coma were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group. Conclusion The efficacy of high oxygen liquid intravenous therapy and hyperbaric oxygen treatment is similar, but the the former has lower incidence of sequelae.