安徽医科大学学报
安徽醫科大學學報
안휘의과대학학보
ACTA UNIVERSITY MEDICINALIS ANHUI
2015年
2期
247-249
,共3页
自适应放疗%肺癌%剂量学
自適應放療%肺癌%劑量學
자괄응방료%폐암%제량학
adaptive radiotherapy%lung cancer%dosimetry
收集6例肺癌患者,在放疗过程中每完成10次分次治疗后,重新扫描、设计计划,并将新计划应用于下一阶段治疗。经过3个阶段放疗后,肿瘤体积缩减(65.59±17.09)%。3种计划中肿瘤靶区的剂量差异无统计学意义。自适应放疗计划(ART)与调强放疗(IMRT)相比,全肺V20、V30、肺平均剂量( MLD )分别减少2.01%、2.66%、241.78 cGy( P =0.005、0.039、0.026);ART2同 ART1相比,全肺V20、V30、MLD 分别减少3.21%、2.97%、288.64 cGy ( P =0.005、0.013、0.046)。患侧肺V20、V30、MLD减少差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而健侧肺指标差异无统计学意义。心脏的V50和Dmean、食管的 V55差异无统计学意义。 ART1与IMRT、ART2与 ART1相比,食管的 Dmean平均分别减少261.98 cGy ( P =0.002)、300.43 cGy ( P =0.008)。脊髓的D2%和Dmean也依次降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
收集6例肺癌患者,在放療過程中每完成10次分次治療後,重新掃描、設計計劃,併將新計劃應用于下一階段治療。經過3箇階段放療後,腫瘤體積縮減(65.59±17.09)%。3種計劃中腫瘤靶區的劑量差異無統計學意義。自適應放療計劃(ART)與調彊放療(IMRT)相比,全肺V20、V30、肺平均劑量( MLD )分彆減少2.01%、2.66%、241.78 cGy( P =0.005、0.039、0.026);ART2同 ART1相比,全肺V20、V30、MLD 分彆減少3.21%、2.97%、288.64 cGy ( P =0.005、0.013、0.046)。患側肺V20、V30、MLD減少差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),而健側肺指標差異無統計學意義。心髒的V50和Dmean、食管的 V55差異無統計學意義。 ART1與IMRT、ART2與 ART1相比,食管的 Dmean平均分彆減少261.98 cGy ( P =0.002)、300.43 cGy ( P =0.008)。脊髓的D2%和Dmean也依次降低,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。
수집6례폐암환자,재방료과정중매완성10차분차치료후,중신소묘、설계계화,병장신계화응용우하일계단치료。경과3개계단방료후,종류체적축감(65.59±17.09)%。3충계화중종류파구적제량차이무통계학의의。자괄응방료계화(ART)여조강방료(IMRT)상비,전폐V20、V30、폐평균제량( MLD )분별감소2.01%、2.66%、241.78 cGy( P =0.005、0.039、0.026);ART2동 ART1상비,전폐V20、V30、MLD 분별감소3.21%、2.97%、288.64 cGy ( P =0.005、0.013、0.046)。환측폐V20、V30、MLD감소차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),이건측폐지표차이무통계학의의。심장적V50화Dmean、식관적 V55차이무통계학의의。 ART1여IMRT、ART2여 ART1상비,식관적 Dmean평균분별감소261.98 cGy ( P =0.002)、300.43 cGy ( P =0.008)。척수적D2%화Dmean야의차강저,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。
Six patients with lung cancer treated with therapy were included. They were retrieved the image and re-planned by fraction 10. The volume of GTV was reduced (65. 59 ± 17. 09)% after three-stage treatments. The doses of target tumor were the same in three-stage treatments. Compared with IMRT, ART1 reduced V20 , V30 , MLD of whole lung by 2. 01%,2. 66%,241. 78 cGy(P=0. 005,0. 039,0. 026). Compared with ART1,ART2 further re-duced the indexes by 3. 21%,2. 97%,288. 64 cGy(P=0. 005,0. 013,0. 046). The doses of ipsilateral lung were reduced significantly (P<0. 05). But this was not for opposite lung. The dose V50,Dmean of heart and V55 of esopha-gus were similar to each plan. Dmean of esophagus with ART1 was smaller than with IMRT(261. 98 cGy,P=0. 002) and Dmean of esophagus with ART2 was smaller than with ART1(300. 43 cGy,P=0. 008). D2% and Dmean of spinal cord were reduced in turn significantly(P<0. 05).