安徽医科大学学报
安徽醫科大學學報
안휘의과대학학보
ACTA UNIVERSITY MEDICINALIS ANHUI
2015年
2期
217-219
,共3页
黎彦彬%张令达%后军%薛浩伟%孙明%胡玉坤
黎彥彬%張令達%後軍%薛浩偉%孫明%鬍玉坤
려언빈%장령체%후군%설호위%손명%호옥곤
颊脂垫%脱细胞真皮基质%颊部软组织%缺损修复
頰脂墊%脫細胞真皮基質%頰部軟組織%缺損脩複
협지점%탈세포진피기질%협부연조직%결손수복
pedicled buccal fat pad flap%acellular dermal matrix%buccal soft tissue%defect repair
目的:观察并比较自体带蒂颊脂垫瓣( PBFPF)与异种脱细胞真皮基质( ADM )在修复颊黏膜缺损中的临床效果。方法选取颊黏膜病损切除后需修补患者共46例,随机分为PBFPF组和ADM组。观察并记录两组患者术前及术后1~6个月最大开口度( MMO)、手术修复时间等,并结合患者满意度进行统计学分析。结果 PBFPF组术后1~3 d MMO均低于ADM组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而术后1周至6个月两组MMO相比差异无统计学意义;两者手术修复时间相比,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05);比较两组患者满意度,差异无统计学意义。结论两种方法均可满足颊部良性肿瘤及口腔中后部T2 N0 M0恶性肿瘤初次的治疗要求,ADM使用更加灵活。但受病例数限制,对于首次切除T2 N0 M0及以下恶性肿瘤首选ADM修复是否合适,还需进一步研究。
目的:觀察併比較自體帶蒂頰脂墊瓣( PBFPF)與異種脫細胞真皮基質( ADM )在脩複頰黏膜缺損中的臨床效果。方法選取頰黏膜病損切除後需脩補患者共46例,隨機分為PBFPF組和ADM組。觀察併記錄兩組患者術前及術後1~6箇月最大開口度( MMO)、手術脩複時間等,併結閤患者滿意度進行統計學分析。結果 PBFPF組術後1~3 d MMO均低于ADM組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);而術後1週至6箇月兩組MMO相比差異無統計學意義;兩者手術脩複時間相比,差異有統計學意義( P<0.05);比較兩組患者滿意度,差異無統計學意義。結論兩種方法均可滿足頰部良性腫瘤及口腔中後部T2 N0 M0噁性腫瘤初次的治療要求,ADM使用更加靈活。但受病例數限製,對于首次切除T2 N0 M0及以下噁性腫瘤首選ADM脩複是否閤適,還需進一步研究。
목적:관찰병비교자체대체협지점판( PBFPF)여이충탈세포진피기질( ADM )재수복협점막결손중적림상효과。방법선취협점막병손절제후수수보환자공46례,수궤분위PBFPF조화ADM조。관찰병기록량조환자술전급술후1~6개월최대개구도( MMO)、수술수복시간등,병결합환자만의도진행통계학분석。결과 PBFPF조술후1~3 d MMO균저우ADM조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);이술후1주지6개월량조MMO상비차이무통계학의의;량자수술수복시간상비,차이유통계학의의( P<0.05);비교량조환자만의도,차이무통계학의의。결론량충방법균가만족협부량성종류급구강중후부T2 N0 M0악성종류초차적치료요구,ADM사용경가령활。단수병례수한제,대우수차절제T2 N0 M0급이하악성종류수선ADM수복시부합괄,환수진일보연구。
Objective To observe and compare the clinical effect of PBFPF and ADM on repairing the defect of buccal mucosa. Methods Forty-six patients were randomly divided into two groups( PBFPF and ADM) . The post-operative 1 to 6 months MMO, repaired time and patients’ satisfaction of two groups were observed, recorded and analyzed. Results The MMO was statistically less in the group ADM 1~3 days after surgery (P<0. 05). 1~6 months after surgery, statistically significant difference was not found in MMO between the two groups. The re-paired time between the two groups was statistically different ( P<0. 05 ) . And there was no statistically significant difference in the two groups about satisfaction degree. Conclusion The ADM is more flexible of the two methods that successfully satisfy the need to treat buccal benign tumoers and malignant tumors( T2 N0 M0 ) for the first time. Considering the limited number of samples, further study is required to prove the surgical treatment effect of ADM on repairing the disease( T2 N0 M0 or T1 N0 M0 ) taking primary surgical resection.