中国医药导刊
中國醫藥導刊
중국의약도간
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GUIDE
2015年
1期
7-8
,共2页
收缩期高血压%老年%干预
收縮期高血壓%老年%榦預
수축기고혈압%노년%간예
Systolic hypertension%Elderly%Intervention
目的：探讨社区干预指导模式治疗老年单纯性收缩期高血压患者的临床疗效。方法：100例老年单纯性收缩期高血压患者随机分为两组，各50例。对照组服用苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平联合贝那普利。观察组在对照组基础上给予社区干预指导模式治疗。2周/疗程，共计4个疗程。结果：观察组患者总有效率显著高于对照组（96% vs 82%，P＜0.05）。两组患者治疗后舒张压分别是（77.2±6.0）mmHg和（78.1±6.4）mmHg，较治疗前无显著差异（P＞0.05）。两组患者治疗后收缩压分别是（127.7±8.4）mmHg和（132.0±8.2）mmHg，较治疗前显著降低（P＜0.05）。观察组患者治疗后收缩压降低幅度显著大于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论：社区干预指导模式有利于提高单纯性收缩期高血压患者治疗效果。
目的：探討社區榦預指導模式治療老年單純性收縮期高血壓患者的臨床療效。方法：100例老年單純性收縮期高血壓患者隨機分為兩組，各50例。對照組服用苯磺痠左鏇氨氯地平聯閤貝那普利。觀察組在對照組基礎上給予社區榦預指導模式治療。2週/療程，共計4箇療程。結果：觀察組患者總有效率顯著高于對照組（96% vs 82%，P＜0.05）。兩組患者治療後舒張壓分彆是（77.2±6.0）mmHg和（78.1±6.4）mmHg，較治療前無顯著差異（P＞0.05）。兩組患者治療後收縮壓分彆是（127.7±8.4）mmHg和（132.0±8.2）mmHg，較治療前顯著降低（P＜0.05）。觀察組患者治療後收縮壓降低幅度顯著大于對照組（P＜0.05）。結論：社區榦預指導模式有利于提高單純性收縮期高血壓患者治療效果。
목적：탐토사구간예지도모식치료노년단순성수축기고혈압환자적림상료효。방법：100례노년단순성수축기고혈압환자수궤분위량조，각50례。대조조복용분광산좌선안록지평연합패나보리。관찰조재대조조기출상급여사구간예지도모식치료。2주/료정，공계4개료정。결과：관찰조환자총유효솔현저고우대조조（96% vs 82%，P＜0.05）。량조환자치료후서장압분별시（77.2±6.0）mmHg화（78.1±6.4）mmHg，교치료전무현저차이（P＞0.05）。량조환자치료후수축압분별시（127.7±8.4）mmHg화（132.0±8.2）mmHg，교치료전현저강저（P＜0.05）。관찰조환자치료후수축압강저폭도현저대우대조조（P＜0.05）。결론：사구간예지도모식유리우제고단순성수축기고혈압환자치료효과。
Objective: To analysis of the clinical efficacy of community intervention guide mode on elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension.Methods:100 cases of elderly patients with systolic hypertension simple were randomly divided into observation group and control group,each had 50 cases. Patients in the group taking levamlodipine besylate tablets combined with benazepril.The observation group received community intervention guide mode on the bases of control group treatment.Two weeks for a course,for efficacy evaluation after four courses.Results:The patients total efficiency of observation group was 96%,it was significantly higher than the control group which was 82%,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). After 4 cours treatment,diastolic were(77.2± 6.0)mmHg and(78.1±6.4)mmHg in two groups, there was no significant difference compared with before treatment(P>0.05).Thesystolic blood pressure were(127.7±8.4)mmHg and (132.0±8.2)mmHg in two groups,which was decreased significantly than before treatment (P<0.05).after treatment The patients systolic blood pressure was significantly lower amplitude than the control group after treatment (P<0.05).Conclusion:The community intervention guide mode can improve efficacy for elderly patients with systolic hypertension simple, it is worthy of promotion.
