中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2014年
31期
42-43
,共2页
锁骨重建接骨板%微创克氏针内固定%锁骨骨折
鎖骨重建接骨闆%微創剋氏針內固定%鎖骨骨摺
쇄골중건접골판%미창극씨침내고정%쇄골골절
Clavicle reconstruction plate%Minimally invasive Kirschner wire fixation%Clavicle fracture
目的:研究锁骨重建接骨板与微创克氏针内固定治疗锁骨骨折疗效差异。方法选取该院骨科收治的锁骨骨折患者98例,采用锁骨重建接骨板与微创克氏针内固定两种方法进行治疗,观察其疗效差异。结果实验组术后治愈率为95.92%,对照组为87.76%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);实验组舒适度满意率、并发症发生率、平均愈合时间分别为89.80%、14.29%、(11.08±0.64)个月,明显优于对照组的59.18%、38.78%、(13.17±1.85)个月,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论微创克氏针内固定法具有疗效好、并发症少、舒适度高、愈合时间短等优点,其临床疗效优于重建接骨板内固定法。
目的:研究鎖骨重建接骨闆與微創剋氏針內固定治療鎖骨骨摺療效差異。方法選取該院骨科收治的鎖骨骨摺患者98例,採用鎖骨重建接骨闆與微創剋氏針內固定兩種方法進行治療,觀察其療效差異。結果實驗組術後治愈率為95.92%,對照組為87.76%,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);實驗組舒適度滿意率、併髮癥髮生率、平均愈閤時間分彆為89.80%、14.29%、(11.08±0.64)箇月,明顯優于對照組的59.18%、38.78%、(13.17±1.85)箇月,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論微創剋氏針內固定法具有療效好、併髮癥少、舒適度高、愈閤時間短等優點,其臨床療效優于重建接骨闆內固定法。
목적:연구쇄골중건접골판여미창극씨침내고정치료쇄골골절료효차이。방법선취해원골과수치적쇄골골절환자98례,채용쇄골중건접골판여미창극씨침내고정량충방법진행치료,관찰기료효차이。결과실험조술후치유솔위95.92%,대조조위87.76%,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);실험조서괄도만의솔、병발증발생솔、평균유합시간분별위89.80%、14.29%、(11.08±0.64)개월,명현우우대조조적59.18%、38.78%、(13.17±1.85)개월,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론미창극씨침내고정법구유료효호、병발증소、서괄도고、유합시간단등우점,기림상료효우우중건접골판내고정법。
Objective To study and compare the effect between clavicle reconstruction plate and minimally invasive Kirschner wire fixation in the treatment of clavicle fracture. Methods 98 patients with clavicle fracture admitted in the department of orthopedics of our hospital were selected, and treated by two methods, clavicle reconstruction plate, minimally invasive Kirschner wire fixation. And the difference in efficacy between the two groups was observed. Results The postoperative cure rate of the experimental group was 95.92%, and that of the control group was 87.76%, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05); the comfort satis-faction rate, incidence of complications, average healing time of the experimental group was 89.80%, 14.29%, (11.08±0.64)months, respectively, significantly better than 59.18%, 38.78%,(13.17±1.85) months of the control group, respectively, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Minimally invasive Kirschner wire fixation method has good efficacy, few complica-tions, high comfort, short healing time and other advantages, its clinical efficacy is superior to the clavicle reconstruction plate fix-ation method.