CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者应用双侧入路PKP治疗的实际效果。方法选取该院收治的骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者50例，按随机数字表法将其分成实验组25例，对照组25例，分别应用单侧﹑双侧入路PKP治疗，比较疗效。结果与对照组相比，实验组患者骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的治疗效果更佳，实验组手术时间为(29.63±5.63)min﹑术后VAS评分为(26.3±1.32)分，术后并发症发生率为0%，以上数据与对照组比较，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论为骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者应用双侧入路PKP治疗，效果显著，值得各级医院应用。
목적：탐토골질소송성추체압축성골절환자응용쌍측입로PKP치료적실제효과。방법선취해원수치적골질소송성추체압축성골절환자50례，안수궤수자표법장기분성실험조25례，대조조25례，분별응용단측﹑쌍측입로PKP치료，비교료효。결과여대조조상비，실험조환자골질소송성추체압축성골절적치료효과경가，실험조수술시간위(29.63±5.63)min﹑술후VAS평분위(26.3±1.32)분，술후병발증발생솔위0%，이상수거여대조조비교，차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론위골질소송성추체압축성골절환자응용쌍측입로PKP치료，효과현저，치득각급의원응용。
Objective To observe the actual effect of PKP via bilateral approach for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral com-pression fracture. Methods 50 cases with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture admitted in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group with 25 cases in each, and treated by PKP via unilateral and bilateral approach, respectively. And the efficacies of the two groups were compared. Results Compared with the control group, the treatment effect of the experimental group was better;the duration of operation of the experimental group was (29.63 ± 5.63) min, postoperative VAS was (26.3 ± 1.32) points, the incidence of postoperative complications was 0%, compared with the control group, the differences in the above data were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion For patients with osteoporotic vertebral com-pression fracture, the treatment effect of PKP via bilateral approach is significant, which is worthy of the application in all levels of hospitals.