CAJ | 학술논문

目的：观察比较两种麻醉方法膀胱镜检查对老年男性患者的效果。方法将80例需要膀胱镜检查的老年男性患者随机分为观察组和对照组各40例。对照组使用2%利多卡因注射液尿道灌注麻醉，观察组使用利多卡因凝胶替代。观察比较2组一次性膀胱镜检查成功率及患者在检查过程中的疼痛不适程度。结果2组一次性硬性膀胱镜检查成功率及患者在检查过程中的疼痛不适程度比较差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05或P＜0.01）。结论盐酸利多卡因胶浆用于硬性膀胱镜检查提高一次检查成功率，减少患者在检查过程中的疼痛不适。
목적：관찰비교량충마취방법방광경검사대노년남성환자적효과。방법장80례수요방광경검사적노년남성환자수궤분위관찰조화대조조각40례。대조조사용2%리다잡인주사액뇨도관주마취，관찰조사용리다잡인응효체대。관찰비교2조일차성방광경검사성공솔급환자재검사과정중적동통불괄정도。결과2조일차성경성방광경검사성공솔급환자재검사과정중적동통불괄정도비교차이균유통계학의의（P＜0.05혹P＜0.01）。결론염산리다잡인효장용우경성방광경검사제고일차검사성공솔，감소환자재검사과정중적동통불괄。
ObjectiveTo observe comparison of two anesthesia methods during cystoscopy in elderly male patients.Methods80 senile male patients were divided into observation group and control group. Control group was using 2% lidocaine injection urethral infusion anesthesia, observation group was using lidocaine gel replacement.To observe and compare the pain during 2 groups examination ans disposable cystoscope examination success rate and patient discomfort degree.Results During the examination, success rate and patient discomfort degree had significant difference (P<0.05 orP<0.01).Conclusion Lidocaine hydrochloride mucilage can improve success rate of check, reduce pain of patients during inspection of discomfort.