CAJ | 학술논문

利用热重分析仪，对比了不同反应温度、不同水蒸气浓度对煅烧石灰石碳酸化反应的影响。碳酸化反应温度在500℃时，反应初期水蒸气对碳酸化反应的影响并不明显，反应10 min之后，在含有1.5%、10%和20%（体积分数）水蒸气条件下碳酸化转化率比无水蒸气条件下转化率分别提高了19.8%、27.2%和30.5%。水蒸气的存在有助于提高碳酸化反应转化率，但随着水蒸气浓度的增加转化率增加幅度减小。利用随机孔隙模型，对产物层扩散阶段扩散系数及反应活化能进行了计算。高温条件下，气氛中含有1.5%的水蒸气使反应活化能从237.7 kJ·mol?1降低到179.9 kJ·mol?1，提高水蒸气浓度到10%和20%后，反应活化能从156.6 kJ·mol?1降低到148.6 kJ·mol?1。不同水蒸气浓度条件下，碳酸化反应存在两个明显特征：一是大约在550℃处存在一个明显扩散系数的斜率变化，这一温度与气氛中是否存在水蒸气无关；另一特征是随着反应温度的提高，水蒸气的促进作用减弱。依据实验和模型计算结果，推测了当反应处于产物层扩散阶段时水蒸气对碳酸化反应影响的作用机理。
이용열중분석의，대비료불동반응온도、불동수증기농도대단소석회석탄산화반응적영향。탄산화반응온도재500℃시，반응초기수증기대탄산화반응적영향병불명현，반응10 min지후，재함유1.5%、10%화20%（체적분수）수증기조건하탄산화전화솔비무수증기조건하전화솔분별제고료19.8%、27.2%화30.5%。수증기적존재유조우제고탄산화반응전화솔，단수착수증기농도적증가전화솔증가폭도감소。이용수궤공극모형，대산물층확산계단확산계수급반응활화능진행료계산。고온조건하，기분중함유1.5%적수증기사반응활화능종237.7 kJ·mol?1강저도179.9 kJ·mol?1，제고수증기농도도10%화20%후，반응활화능종156.6 kJ·mol?1강저도148.6 kJ·mol?1。불동수증기농도조건하，탄산화반응존재량개명현특정：일시대약재550℃처존재일개명현확산계수적사솔변화，저일온도여기분중시부존재수증기무관；령일특정시수착반응온도적제고，수증기적촉진작용감약。의거실험화모형계산결과，추측료당반응처우산물층확산계단시수증기대탄산화반응영향적작용궤리。
Steam is present in combustion flue gas, oxy-fuel combustor/calciner and fuel gas. Some previous works in this field have examined the reactivity of calcium oxide in the presence of steam. There is general agreement that the presence of steam increases the rate of carbonation even at low concentrations. However, there is no description about the effect of steam on the carbonation reaction of calcined limestone. The effects of temperature, concentration of steam on carbonation were investigated in a thermogravimetric analyzer. The understanding of the mechanisms participating in the carbonation reaction could be arrived at through the use of model interpretations of the rate controlling process. The experimental data were analyzed by means of the random pore model. During carbonation reaction, a very initial rapid reaction was followed by the second stage of the reaction occurring in the next slower regime. The experiment results showed that the effect of steam on carbonation could be neglected during the first stage of reaction. However, the conversion of carbonation in the presence of 1.5%(vol), 10%(vol) and 20%(vol) steam were 19.8%, 27.2%and 30.5%higher than the conversion without steam after 10 min during the second stage of reaction at 500℃. Steam was beneficial to enhancing the conversion of carbonation, but the extent of increase became not significant with increasing concentration of steam. The linearity of the second stage reaction data strongly suggested that this stage was controlled by a diffusion process occurring in a layer of calcium carbonate surrounding the calcium oxide in the pores of the solid. The parameters related to effective product layer diffusivities were plotted in Arrhenius form and the changes in activation energy at various steam concentrations were also shown. Comparison with the experimental effective diffusivities calculated for the carbonation reaction showed that the activation energies in the lower temperature range were in agreement with those obtained in the conductivity measurements. This suggested that the product layer diffusion process was proceeded by a mechanism similar to that of conduction in calcium carbonate. The activation energy of carbonation decreased from 179.9 kJ·mol?1 to 237.7 kJ·mol?1 when 1.5%steam was added according to the random pore model. The activation energy was 156.6 kJ·mol?1 and 148.6 kJ·mol?1 respectively for the atmospheres of 10% and 20% steam. There were two characteristics of product layer diffusion during carbonation. One was the slope of diffusional coefficient to increase from about 550℃, which was irrelevant to the presence of steam. The other was the effect of steam on carbonation to turn weak with increasing concentration of steam. At the higher temperature range, the possible mechanism for effective diffusion could be associated with sequential decompositions of carbonate ions in the calcium carbonate layer. A carbonate ion momentarily decomposed to generate carbon dioxide and an oxygen ion. The carbon dioxide molecule then moved to a neighboring similarly vacated site, while another carbon dioxide so generated elsewhere moved to take its place and reform the carbonate ion. In this way by a site to site random walk the carbon dioxide molecule diffused through the product layer, before reaction at the interface of calcium oxide and calcium carbonate. Such a mechanism appeared more prominent than the motion of carbonate ion at the higher temperature range. Both the above mechanisms for the diffusion stage were likely, and the true situation might involve one or a combination of both.