中国中医药信息杂志
中國中醫藥信息雜誌
중국중의약신식잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INFORMATION ON TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE
2015年
3期
27-31
,共5页
田丰玮%王竹行%李映%祖建%李宁%徐光燕%周熙%王成伟
田豐瑋%王竹行%李映%祖建%李寧%徐光燕%週熙%王成偉
전봉위%왕죽행%리영%조건%리저%서광연%주희%왕성위
中风%中脏腑%中医围攻方案%临床随机对照试验
中風%中髒腑%中醫圍攻方案%臨床隨機對照試驗
중풍%중장부%중의위공방안%림상수궤대조시험
stroke%bowel and visceral strike%siege scheme of traditional Chinese medicine%clinical randomized controlled trial
目的:观察中医围攻方案治疗中风病急性期中脏腑闭证的疗效。方法采用前瞻性、多中心、随机平行对照试验方法,将110例中风病急性期中脏腑闭证患者随机分为中医围攻组和对照组各55例。对照组采用西医常规治疗,中医围攻组在此基础上辨证采用低温中药枕、中药灌肠等多种方式相结合的中医围攻方案治疗,疗程4周。比较2组格拉斯哥昏迷评分、因病情变化导致气管切开人数、尿管与鼻饲管拔出时间。结果2组患者治疗前基线资料具有可比性(P>0.05)。治疗第10、15日,2组清醒人数比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);中医围攻组气管切开人数少于对照组,尿管与鼻饲管成功拔出时间早于对照组(P<0.05)。结论中医围攻方案可改善缺血性脑卒中急性期中脏腑患者的意识障碍,减少并发症,更早拔出尿管与鼻饲管,为进一步康复治疗提供保证。
目的:觀察中醫圍攻方案治療中風病急性期中髒腑閉證的療效。方法採用前瞻性、多中心、隨機平行對照試驗方法,將110例中風病急性期中髒腑閉證患者隨機分為中醫圍攻組和對照組各55例。對照組採用西醫常規治療,中醫圍攻組在此基礎上辨證採用低溫中藥枕、中藥灌腸等多種方式相結閤的中醫圍攻方案治療,療程4週。比較2組格拉斯哥昏迷評分、因病情變化導緻氣管切開人數、尿管與鼻飼管拔齣時間。結果2組患者治療前基線資料具有可比性(P>0.05)。治療第10、15日,2組清醒人數比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);中醫圍攻組氣管切開人數少于對照組,尿管與鼻飼管成功拔齣時間早于對照組(P<0.05)。結論中醫圍攻方案可改善缺血性腦卒中急性期中髒腑患者的意識障礙,減少併髮癥,更早拔齣尿管與鼻飼管,為進一步康複治療提供保證。
목적:관찰중의위공방안치료중풍병급성기중장부폐증적료효。방법채용전첨성、다중심、수궤평행대조시험방법,장110례중풍병급성기중장부폐증환자수궤분위중의위공조화대조조각55례。대조조채용서의상규치료,중의위공조재차기출상변증채용저온중약침、중약관장등다충방식상결합적중의위공방안치료,료정4주。비교2조격랍사가혼미평분、인병정변화도치기관절개인수、뇨관여비사관발출시간。결과2조환자치료전기선자료구유가비성(P>0.05)。치료제10、15일,2조청성인수비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);중의위공조기관절개인수소우대조조,뇨관여비사관성공발출시간조우대조조(P<0.05)。결론중의위공방안가개선결혈성뇌졸중급성기중장부환자적의식장애,감소병발증,경조발출뇨관여비사관,위진일보강복치료제공보증。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of siege scheme of TCM for acute cerebral infarction bowel and visceral strike (block pattern). Methods Totally 110 patients were randomly divided into TCM siege scheme group (55 cases) and control group (55 cases) by randomized parallel controlled study with foresight and multicenter. The control group was treated with the standardized treatment, and TCM siege scheme group was treated with TCM siege scheme, including mild hypothermia TCM pillow therapy, TCM rectal enema, and other multiple treatments based on the standardized treatment. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), the time of pulling out urine tube and nasal feeding tube, and the number of tracheotomy caused by illness changes of the two groups were compared. Results The baseline data of two groups have good comparability (P>0.05). On 10, 15 d of treatment, the number of lucid people in the TCM siege scheme group was significantly more than that in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, treatment group had less number of tracheotomy, and shorter time of success pulling out urine tube and nasogastric feeding tube (P<0.05). Conclusion TCM siege scheme can improve the consciousness of ischemic stroke in patients with acute cerebral infarction bowel and visceral strike, reduce complications, shows shorter successful pull urine tube and nasogastric feeding, and provides guarantee conditions for further rehabilitation treatment.