数字图书馆论坛
數字圖書館論罈
수자도서관론단
DIGITAL LIBRARY FORUM
2015年
1期
15-20
,共6页
STM%信息资源行业%中美对比分析
STM%信息資源行業%中美對比分析
STM%신식자원행업%중미대비분석
STM%Information resources%Industry comparison
选取STM信息资源市场规模最大的美国作为对象,分析中美两国政府主导的科技信息资源市场、科技出版行业、科技信息服务行业等行业主体结构的发展差异,比较两国的行业投入产出情况,从政策法规、市场环境、人才建设等方面比较两国的行业发展环境。对比发现,中国在创新成果质量、科研投入比重等方面与美国存在差距,同时国内相关政策法规体系、信息资源人才培养体系等都有待完善。
選取STM信息資源市場規模最大的美國作為對象,分析中美兩國政府主導的科技信息資源市場、科技齣版行業、科技信息服務行業等行業主體結構的髮展差異,比較兩國的行業投入產齣情況,從政策法規、市場環境、人纔建設等方麵比較兩國的行業髮展環境。對比髮現,中國在創新成果質量、科研投入比重等方麵與美國存在差距,同時國內相關政策法規體繫、信息資源人纔培養體繫等都有待完善。
선취STM신식자원시장규모최대적미국작위대상,분석중미량국정부주도적과기신식자원시장、과기출판행업、과기신식복무행업등행업주체결구적발전차이,비교량국적행업투입산출정황,종정책법규、시장배경、인재건설등방면비교량국적행업발전배경。대비발현,중국재창신성과질량、과연투입비중등방면여미국존재차거,동시국내상관정책법규체계、신식자원인재배양체계등도유대완선。
The article selected the United States which has the largest STM information resources market as a comparison object. It analyzed the difference between China and the US in the government-led science and technology information resources market, scientific publishing industry, science and technology information services industry and other sectors of the main STM structure, and compared theinput-output of industry, and compared the development environment of the industry from the aspects of policies and regulations, market conditions, personnel training. The result showed that Chinese STM information resources industry had lower degree of marketization and quality of technological research achievements. At the same time, the policies and regulations related to the industry need to be improved as wel as the personnel training system.