中国中西医结合外科杂志
中國中西醫結閤外科雜誌
중국중서의결합외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF SURGERY OF INTEGRATED TRADITIONAL AND WESTERN MEDICINE
2015年
1期
32-35
,共4页
阑尾脓肿%穿刺引流%中药治疗%疗效比较
闌尾膿腫%穿刺引流%中藥治療%療效比較
란미농종%천자인류%중약치료%료효비교
Appendiceal abscesses%puncture drainage%Chinese medicine treatment%effect comparison
目的：探讨阑尾脓肿的中西医结合治疗效果。方法：回顾性分析收治的104例阑尾脓肿患者，分为西医治疗组46例，中西医结合治疗组58例。西医治疗组给予单纯B超导向下穿刺辅助抗生素治疗，中西医结合组除给予B超导向下穿刺及抗生素治疗外，同时口服阑尾清解汤以及局部外敷芙蓉散治疗，比较两组的住院时间、住院费用、脓肿消失时间以及两组临床疗效。结果：西医治疗组平均住院时间（19.6±14.6）d，远长于中西医结合治疗组平均住院时间（11.6±5.2）d，西医治疗组住院费用（30153.7±13680.3）元也远远高于中西医结合治疗组住院费用（18238.7±7106.1）元。脓肿消失时间方面，中西医结合治疗组为（4.1±1.6）d，而西医治疗组为（5.9±4.2）d，结论：中西医结合治疗阑尾脓肿比单纯西医治疗住院时间短,费用低，脓肿消退快，是一种行而有效的治疗手段。
目的：探討闌尾膿腫的中西醫結閤治療效果。方法：迴顧性分析收治的104例闌尾膿腫患者，分為西醫治療組46例，中西醫結閤治療組58例。西醫治療組給予單純B超導嚮下穿刺輔助抗生素治療，中西醫結閤組除給予B超導嚮下穿刺及抗生素治療外，同時口服闌尾清解湯以及跼部外敷芙蓉散治療，比較兩組的住院時間、住院費用、膿腫消失時間以及兩組臨床療效。結果：西醫治療組平均住院時間（19.6±14.6）d，遠長于中西醫結閤治療組平均住院時間（11.6±5.2）d，西醫治療組住院費用（30153.7±13680.3）元也遠遠高于中西醫結閤治療組住院費用（18238.7±7106.1）元。膿腫消失時間方麵，中西醫結閤治療組為（4.1±1.6）d，而西醫治療組為（5.9±4.2）d，結論：中西醫結閤治療闌尾膿腫比單純西醫治療住院時間短,費用低，膿腫消退快，是一種行而有效的治療手段。
목적：탐토란미농종적중서의결합치료효과。방법：회고성분석수치적104례란미농종환자，분위서의치료조46례，중서의결합치료조58례。서의치료조급여단순B초도향하천자보조항생소치료，중서의결합조제급여B초도향하천자급항생소치료외，동시구복란미청해탕이급국부외부부용산치료，비교량조적주원시간、주원비용、농종소실시간이급량조림상료효。결과：서의치료조평균주원시간（19.6±14.6）d，원장우중서의결합치료조평균주원시간（11.6±5.2）d，서의치료조주원비용（30153.7±13680.3）원야원원고우중서의결합치료조주원비용（18238.7±7106.1）원。농종소실시간방면，중서의결합치료조위（4.1±1.6）d，이서의치료조위（5.9±4.2）d，결론：중서의결합치료란미농종비단순서의치료주원시간단,비용저，농종소퇴쾌，시일충행이유효적치료수단。
Objective To explore the treatment effect of appendiceal abscesses by the methods of integra?tive Chinese and western medicine. Methods There were 104 patients in our hospital which were divided in?to two groups, 46 of them were Western medicine treatment group and another 58 were integrative Chinese and western medicine treatment group. Those patients in western medicine treatment group were treated with Simple B ultrasound guided puncture drainage and antibiotics. On this basis, the traditional Chinese and western medi?cine treatment groups, Except for the basic treatment, patients in this group were also given Oral appendix clear soup and Lotus powder through partial externally applying. Finally we compared hospitalization time and fees, es?pecially abscess disappeared time and the clinical results. Results The Western medicine group hospitaliza?tion time(19.6±14.6)days is far longer than the traditional Chinese and western medicine group hospitalization time(11.6±5.2)days. The hospitalization fee, the former(30153.7±13680.3)Yuan is much higher than the latter (18 238.7 ± 7106.1)Yuan. The same, the abscess disappeared time in the traditional Chinese and western medi?cine group(4.1 ± 1.6)days is lower than the Western medicine group(5.9 ± 4.2)days. By statistical analysis, inte?grative Chinese and western medicine treatment is shorter in hospitalization time, lower cost in fee, the abscess disappeared time faster and effect better than Western medicine treatment. Conclusion The integrative Chi?nese and western medicine is more effective.
