CAJ | 학술논문

合同解除与违约损害赔偿的关系经历了从择一主义到并用主义转变的历史进程。合同解除与合同终止是两个不同的概念。而合同法定解除实质上是违约责任，其性质是请求权而非形成权。我国合同法定解除后的损害赔偿请求权基础为因债务不履行所生的对履行利益的损害赔偿请求权，而非合同因法定解除而生的对信赖利益的损害赔偿请求权。关于合同法定解除后的溯及力，应采德国通说即清算关系说。
합동해제여위약손해배상적관계경력료종택일주의도병용주의전변적역사진정。합동해제여합동종지시량개불동적개념。이합동법정해제실질상시위약책임，기성질시청구권이비형성권。아국합동법정해제후적손해배상청구권기출위인채무불리행소생적대리행이익적손해배상청구권，이비합동인법정해제이생적대신뢰이익적손해배상청구권。관우합동법정해제후적소급력，응채덕국통설즉청산관계설。
The relationship between contract rescission and damages for a breach of the contract has experienced a historical progression from alternative to socialism. The rescission of the contract and the termination of the contract are different concepts. Essentially speaking, contract rescission is a breach of contract, whose essence should be a right of claim rather then that of formation. The basis for claim compensation for damage on termination of the contract is the claim compensation for damage of the benefit based on the non-performance of the debt rather than based on the rescission of the contract. On the retroactivity of termination of the contract, we should adopt the general view of the German, that is, the relationship theory of liquidation.