技术经济与管理研究
技術經濟與管理研究
기술경제여관리연구
TECHNOECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT RESEARCH
2015年
3期
18-21
,共4页
期货交易%信息博弈%品种竞争%资源配置
期貨交易%信息博弈%品種競爭%資源配置
기화교역%신식박혁%품충경쟁%자원배치
Futures exchange%Information game%Varieties competition%Resources allocation
期货市场的信息博弈是指监管层、交易所、期货公司和投资者等各参与主体间围绕信息流动各环节产生的信息不对称这一固有现象进行的博弈。信息博弈的关键要素是资源配置。在现有的法律框架下,期货交易所申请新品种上市,需由作为监管层的中国证监会审核和批复。监管层是品种资源的所有者,交易所是品种资源的使用者,监管层的职责就是将有限的品种资源在各交易所间合理分配以实现整个期货行业的收益最大化,而交易所的目标则是争取到足够的品种资源使本交易所的收益最大化,因此,每个交易所与监管层间都不可避免地产生信息博弈。通过构建基于品种竞争的期货交易所与监管层的信息博弈模型,可以进一步解释资源有限条件下一个分配者与多个争取者之间的多主体博弈,具有普遍的分析意义。
期貨市場的信息博弈是指鑑管層、交易所、期貨公司和投資者等各參與主體間圍繞信息流動各環節產生的信息不對稱這一固有現象進行的博弈。信息博弈的關鍵要素是資源配置。在現有的法律框架下,期貨交易所申請新品種上市,需由作為鑑管層的中國證鑑會審覈和批複。鑑管層是品種資源的所有者,交易所是品種資源的使用者,鑑管層的職責就是將有限的品種資源在各交易所間閤理分配以實現整箇期貨行業的收益最大化,而交易所的目標則是爭取到足夠的品種資源使本交易所的收益最大化,因此,每箇交易所與鑑管層間都不可避免地產生信息博弈。通過構建基于品種競爭的期貨交易所與鑑管層的信息博弈模型,可以進一步解釋資源有限條件下一箇分配者與多箇爭取者之間的多主體博弈,具有普遍的分析意義。
기화시장적신식박혁시지감관층、교역소、기화공사화투자자등각삼여주체간위요신식류동각배절산생적신식불대칭저일고유현상진행적박혁。신식박혁적관건요소시자원배치。재현유적법률광가하,기화교역소신청신품충상시,수유작위감관층적중국증감회심핵화비복。감관층시품충자원적소유자,교역소시품충자원적사용자,감관층적직책취시장유한적품충자원재각교역소간합리분배이실현정개기화행업적수익최대화,이교역소적목표칙시쟁취도족구적품충자원사본교역소적수익최대화,인차,매개교역소여감관층간도불가피면지산생신식박혁。통과구건기우품충경쟁적기화교역소여감관층적신식박혁모형,가이진일보해석자원유한조건하일개분배자여다개쟁취자지간적다주체박혁,구유보편적분석의의。
Information game in futures market refers to the game of regulators, exchanges, futures company and investors around the inherent phenomenon of the information asymmetry occurred in each link of the information flow. The key element of information game is the allocation of resources. In the existing legal framework, futures exchange listing of new varieties needs the regulators as China SFC's auditing and approval. Regulators are owners of variety resources, exchanges are users of variety resources, the obligation of regulators is allocating limited resources between each exchange reasonably in order to maximize earnings of whole exchange industry , while the object of exchange is striving for enough variety resources in order to maximize earning of its exchange. The game between the exchange and the supervisor is inevitable. Constructing game model of futures exchange and supervisor on the basis of varieties competition can further explain the multi-subject game between a distributor and a plurality of activists with limited resources and it has the universal significance for relevant analysis.