CAJ | 학술논문

准确测定表层土壤水分对陆地-大气间水热交换研究具有重要意义。由于对土壤结构影响轻微，热脉冲技术在原位监测含水率方面具有较大优越性，但目前田间应用集中在5 cm以下土层。该研究利用多针热脉冲传感器测定土壤容积热容量，然后基于热脉冲含水率法和热脉冲含水率变化法分别得到了3、9、21和39 mm的土壤含水率。结果表明，与烘干法含水率比较，热脉冲含水率变化法含水率在4个深度的均方根误差分别为0.022、0.006、0.004和0.006 m3/m3，均小于相应深度上热脉冲含水率法含水率的均方根误差。另外，热脉冲含水率变化法也降低了4个热脉冲传感器测定含水率的变异性。因此，热脉冲技术能够监测表层的土壤水分动态，表层土壤含水率的均方根误差在0.022 m3/m3以内。
준학측정표층토양수분대륙지-대기간수열교환연구구유중요의의。유우대토양결구영향경미，열맥충기술재원위감측함수솔방면구유교대우월성，단목전전간응용집중재5 cm이하토층。해연구이용다침열맥충전감기측정토양용적열용량，연후기우열맥충함수솔법화열맥충함수솔변화법분별득도료3、9、21화39 mm적토양함수솔。결과표명，여홍간법함수솔비교，열맥충함수솔변화법함수솔재4개심도적균방근오차분별위0.022、0.006、0.004화0.006 m3/m3，균소우상응심도상열맥충함수솔법함수솔적균방근오차。령외，열맥충함수솔변화법야강저료4개열맥충전감기측정함수솔적변이성。인차，열맥충기술능구감측표층적토양수분동태，표층토양함수솔적균방근오차재0.022 m3/m3이내。
Accurate measurement of near-surface soil water content (0-5 cm) is essential for studying water and heat exchange between land and atmosphere. Heat-pulse technique has potential to measure soil volumetric water content, but only used in laboratory, greenhouse and field at depths below 5 cm. The objective of this study was to test the possibility of heat-pulse technique for measuring water content in near-surface soil layer (0-5 cm) in the field. The experiment was conducted in a sandy loam soil in an experimental plot (2 m×2 m×2 m) in China Agricultural University. Multi-needle heat-pulse sensor was used to measure volumetric heat capacity in various depths above 5 cm and four multi-needle heat-pulse sensors were used. Average volumetric heat capacity from four multi-needle heat-pulse sensors was calculated at each depth and the values at four depths (3, 9, 21 and 39 mm) were extracted to be analyzed. When calculating soil volumetric heat capacity from temperature change versus time data, the pulse infinite line source theory was used at 9, 21 and 39 mm, while for volumetric heat capacity at 3 mm, the pulse infinite line source-adiabatic boundary condition was used because of the soil-air interface effect. Based on the linear relationship of soil volumetric heat capacity and volumetric water content in mineral soil, soil volumetric water content could be calculated from soil volumetric heat capacity, volumetric heat capacity of water, soil bulk density and solid heat capacity, which was named heat-pulse water content method. When the temporal series of soil volumetric heat capacity were measured, the change in soil water content could be calculated without knowledge of soil-specific properties. With the initial water content measured by another independent method, dynamic of soil water content could be determined from the change in soil water content series data and this method was called heat-pulse water content change method. Water contents at those four depths were calculated by the above two methods respectively. Besides, a ring device was made for collecting and splitting soil samples into nine layers in 0- to 5-cm depth. With the ring device, water contents at 3, 9, 21 and 39 mm were determined by the traditional gravimetric method. Water contents from gravimetric method were used to evaluate accuracy of water contents from heat-pulse technique. The results showed that compared with soil water contents from gravimetric method, root mean square errors of soil water contents from heat-pulse water content method were 0.082, 0.075, 0.018 and 0.018 m3/m3 and mean deviations were 0.076, 0.073, 0.009 and 0.010 m3/m3 at four depths, while for the values from heat-pulse water content change method, root mean square errors were 0.022, 0.006, 0.004 and 0.006 m3/m3 and mean deviations were 0.048, 0.024, 0.017 and 0.025 m3/m3, indicating that heat-pulse water content change method could obtain more accurate results. The maximum standard deviations of water contents from heat-pulse water content method were 0.077, 0.077, 0.044 and 0.059 m3/m3 at four depths. For soil water contents from heat-pulse water content change method, the maximum standard deviations were 0.061, 0.052, 0.019 and 0.021 m3/m3, all smaller than those values from heat-pulse water content method, showing heat-pulse water content change method decreased the differences of water content measurements among four multi-needle heat-pulse sensors. The results showed that heat-pulse water content change method could measure soil water content accurately at depths of 3, 9, 21 and 39 mm, with root mean square error less than 0.022 m3/m3. Heat-pulse technique can accurately measure water content in near-surface soil layer, but further research is needed for accurate water content measurement in 0-3 mm soil layer.