农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
2015年
2期
312-318
,共7页
祝志慧%谢德君%李婉清%王巧华%马美湖
祝誌慧%謝德君%李婉清%王巧華%馬美湖
축지혜%사덕군%리완청%왕교화%마미호
无损检测%分类器%光谱分析%异物蛋%多分类器融合
無損檢測%分類器%光譜分析%異物蛋%多分類器融閤
무손검측%분류기%광보분석%이물단%다분류기융합
nondestructive examination%classifiers%spectrum analysis%abnormal eggs%multiple classifier fusion
为了提高鸡蛋中的血斑和肉斑的检测准确率,给消费者提供高品质的鸡蛋,该文利用微型光纤光谱仪采集鸡蛋的透射光谱,在单分类器的基础上,通过多分类器的融合对异物蛋进行检测。首先根据差异性度量选取朴素贝叶斯, AdaBoost和SVM分类器作为单分类器,然后通过特征级融合选取了5个基分类器。最后,5个基分类器以加权投票机制进行决策级融合。多分类器融合对正常蛋和异物蛋的检测准确率分别为92.86%和91.07%。试验结果表明,利用多分类器融合所建立的模型优于单一分类器的模型,提高了对异物蛋的检测准确率。
為瞭提高鷄蛋中的血斑和肉斑的檢測準確率,給消費者提供高品質的鷄蛋,該文利用微型光纖光譜儀採集鷄蛋的透射光譜,在單分類器的基礎上,通過多分類器的融閤對異物蛋進行檢測。首先根據差異性度量選取樸素貝葉斯, AdaBoost和SVM分類器作為單分類器,然後通過特徵級融閤選取瞭5箇基分類器。最後,5箇基分類器以加權投票機製進行決策級融閤。多分類器融閤對正常蛋和異物蛋的檢測準確率分彆為92.86%和91.07%。試驗結果錶明,利用多分類器融閤所建立的模型優于單一分類器的模型,提高瞭對異物蛋的檢測準確率。
위료제고계단중적혈반화육반적검측준학솔,급소비자제공고품질적계단,해문이용미형광섬광보의채집계단적투사광보,재단분류기적기출상,통과다분류기적융합대이물단진행검측。수선근거차이성도량선취박소패협사, AdaBoost화SVM분류기작위단분류기,연후통과특정급융합선취료5개기분류기。최후,5개기분류기이가권투표궤제진행결책급융합。다분류기융합대정상단화이물단적검측준학솔분별위92.86%화91.07%。시험결과표명,이용다분류기융합소건립적모형우우단일분류기적모형,제고료대이물단적검측준학솔。
The aim of the research was to improve detection accuracy of the blood spots and meat spots in eggs, which can provide consumers with high-quality eggs. Spectroscopy technology and multiple classifier fusion for abnormal egg detection were investigated. Micro fiber spectrometer (Ocean Optics company, USB2000+) was used to collect the transmittance spectroscopy of both normal and abnormal eggs, which were from Hubei Shendan Healthy Food Co., Ltd. After outliers detection and elimination, there were 336 eggs in all, which were randomly assigned to training set and test set; among the 336 eggs, 224 (about two-thirds of the total) were assigned to the training set, and the remaining 112 (about one-third of the total) were assigned to the test set. Before multiple classifier fusion, all data collected from micro fiber spectrometer was preprocessed including the methods of SNV (standard normal variate), smoothing and MSC (multiplicative scatter correction). usion of multiple classifiers was used to detect the foreign bodies of eggs on the basis of single-classifier. Firstly, five single-classifiers which was inclusive of Naive Bayes classifier, Mahalanobis distance classifier, PLS-DA (partial least squares-discriminate analysis) classifier, AdaBoost (adaptive boosting) classifier and SVM (support vector machine) classifier were all trained, and five groups of classification results were attained. In order to choose suitable one from these five single-classifiers, according to diversity measure, output disagreement measure and error agreement measure were introduced and used, and Naive Bayes, AdaBoost and SVM classifiers were selected as the single-classifiers; then, on the basis of these three selected single-classifiers, through feature level fusion, 21 base-classifiers were obtained. In order to get the final base-classifiers which were used to accomplish the multiple classifier fusion, in a similar way, through output disagreement measure and error agreement measure again, 5 base-classifiers were chosen from these 21 base-classifiers. Finally, 5 basic-classifiers were fused by weight vote strategy on the decision level. The weight vote strategy was that each base-classifier was allocated a weight value according to its accuracy rate, and the higher accuracy rate a base-classifier had, the larger weight value it would be allocated, because it was more trusted. Detection accuracy rate of ensemble classifier, which was formed after multiple classifier fusion, was 92.86% and 91.07%, respectively for normal eggs and abnormal eggs. As a contrast, among all the single-classifiers and base-classifiers, the highest detection accuracy of normal eggs in the test set was 91.07%, which came from AdaBoost (500-600 nm), and the highest detection accuracy of abnormal eggs in the test set was 89.29%, which came from SVM (550-600 nm). The experiment results showed that the model established by multiple classifier fusion could take full advantage of the information which came from each single-classifier or base-classifier, and in the aspect of the detection accuracy of either normal eggs or abnormal eggs, the model established by multiple classifier fusion was indeed superior to the model established by each single-classifier or base-classifier. Even though the detection accuracy was enhanced by a small margin, considering that a large number of either normal eggs or abnormal eggs were being produced and being detected in lots of companies that were involved in eggs, in this meaning, the slight promotion of detection accuracy was of great significance.