CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨普外急腹症应用腹腔镜的临床疗效。方法选取我院收治的128例普外急腹症患者随机均分为对照组与观察组。对照组64例采用常规开腹手术治疗，观察组64例采用腹腔镜微创治疗，对两组患者的治疗情况进行分析与比较。结果观察组与对照组在术中与术后疗效对比，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。两组患者于术后均产生再发腹痛、腹胀等并发症，对照组出现2例失血性休克，3例伤口愈合延迟。结论在普外急腹症治疗中，采用腹腔镜微创治疗技术能够取得显著的疗效，值得临床推广。
목적：탐토보외급복증응용복강경적림상료효。방법선취아원수치적128례보외급복증환자수궤균분위대조조여관찰조。대조조64례채용상규개복수술치료，관찰조64례채용복강경미창치료，대량조환자적치료정황진행분석여비교。결과관찰조여대조조재술중여술후료효대비，차이구유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。량조환자우술후균산생재발복통、복창등병발증，대조조출현2례실혈성휴극，3례상구유합연지。결론재보외급복증치료중，채용복강경미창치료기술능구취득현저적료효，치득림상추엄。
Objective To investigate and analyze the clinical effect of laparoscopic abdominal emergency in general application. Methods Select 128 cases of our hospital general acute abdomen were randomly divided into control group and observation group in the two groups. Treatment with control group, 64 cases of conventional laparotomy, observation group of 64 cases of laparoscopic minimally invasive treatment, treatment in two groups of patients were analyzed and compared. Results The observation group and control group in intraoperative and postoperative therapeutic efifcacy compared signiifcant difference, statistically signiifcant (P<0.05), Two groups of patients in the postoperative recurrence of complications such as abdominal pain, abdominal distention, in 2 cases of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, 3 cases of wound healing delay. Conclusion In general treatment of acute abdominal pain, laparoscopic minimally invasive treatment technology can obtain obvious curative effect, worth clinical promotion.