CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对比喙突移位术与锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节Ⅱ°、Ⅲ°脱位的临床疗效。方法应用喙突移位术治疗肩锁关节Ⅱ°、Ⅲ°脱位10例，锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节Ⅱ°、Ⅲ°脱位12例。结果22例患者随访8月～2.5年，采用Lazzcano功能评定标准，喙突移位术组优良9例，锁骨钩钢板组优良12例。结论喙突移位术及锁骨钩钢板均为肩锁关节脱位治疗的有效方法，且前者费用为后者1/2左右。
목적：대비훼돌이위술여쇄골구강판치료견쇄관절Ⅱ°、Ⅲ°탈위적림상료효。방법응용훼돌이위술치료견쇄관절Ⅱ°、Ⅲ°탈위10례，쇄골구강판치료견쇄관절Ⅱ°、Ⅲ°탈위12례。결과22례환자수방8월～2.5년，채용Lazzcano공능평정표준，훼돌이위술조우량9례，쇄골구강판조우량12례。결론훼돌이위술급쇄골구강판균위견쇄관절탈위치료적유효방법，차전자비용위후자1/2좌우。
Objective To compare the clinical curative effect between coracoid transposition and clavicular hook plate in the treatment of acromioclavicular jointⅡ°,Ⅲ° dislocation. Methods 10 cases withⅡ°,Ⅲ° dislocationuse of acromioclavicular joint were treated by coracoid transposition. Another 12 cases withⅡ°,Ⅲ° dislocationuse of acromioclavicular joint were treated by clavicular hook plate. Results The 22 patients were followed up for 8 months to 2.5 years, adopt Lazzcano function evaluation standard, the number of excellent cases in coracoid transposition group and in clavicular hook plate group were 9 and 12. Conclusion Coracoid transposition and clavicular hook plate both are the effective methods for treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation, and the cost is about half that of the latter.