应用光学
應用光學
응용광학
JOURNAL OF APPLIED OPTICS
2015年
1期
58-63
,共6页
闫乐乐%李辉%邱聚能%梁平
閆樂樂%李輝%邱聚能%樑平
염악악%리휘%구취능%량평
图像质量评价%区域对比度%SSIM%人眼视觉特性
圖像質量評價%區域對比度%SSIM%人眼視覺特性
도상질량평개%구역대비도%SSIM%인안시각특성
image quality assessment%regional contrast%SSIM%HVS characteristics
在诸多图像质量评价方法中,结构相似度(SSIM )算法简单高效,准确性较高,但SSIM模型不能很好地评价存在局部失真和交叉失真类型的图像。针对SSIM算法对图像不同区域平等对待的不足并考虑了时域人眼视觉特性,提出一种改进的基于区域对比度和结构相似度(RC‐SSIM )的图像质量评价方法。该算法将图像区域灰度信息对比度与SSIM 算法融合,加权归一为参考图像与失真图像的对比度结构相似度值,以其评价图像质量。在LIVE图像数据库上的实验结果表明,与SSIM 算法相比,RCSSIM 评价结果的皮尔逊线性相关系数提高约0.015,均方根误差减小约0.55,更接近于人眼主观测试结果,具有更好的评价性能。
在諸多圖像質量評價方法中,結構相似度(SSIM )算法簡單高效,準確性較高,但SSIM模型不能很好地評價存在跼部失真和交扠失真類型的圖像。針對SSIM算法對圖像不同區域平等對待的不足併攷慮瞭時域人眼視覺特性,提齣一種改進的基于區域對比度和結構相似度(RC‐SSIM )的圖像質量評價方法。該算法將圖像區域灰度信息對比度與SSIM 算法融閤,加權歸一為參攷圖像與失真圖像的對比度結構相似度值,以其評價圖像質量。在LIVE圖像數據庫上的實驗結果錶明,與SSIM 算法相比,RCSSIM 評價結果的皮爾遜線性相關繫數提高約0.015,均方根誤差減小約0.55,更接近于人眼主觀測試結果,具有更好的評價性能。
재제다도상질량평개방법중,결구상사도(SSIM )산법간단고효,준학성교고,단SSIM모형불능흔호지평개존재국부실진화교차실진류형적도상。침대SSIM산법대도상불동구역평등대대적불족병고필료시역인안시각특성,제출일충개진적기우구역대비도화결구상사도(RC‐SSIM )적도상질량평개방법。해산법장도상구역회도신식대비도여SSIM 산법융합,가권귀일위삼고도상여실진도상적대비도결구상사도치,이기평개도상질량。재LIVE도상수거고상적실험결과표명,여SSIM 산법상비,RCSSIM 평개결과적피이손선성상관계수제고약0.015,균방근오차감소약0.55,경접근우인안주관측시결과,구유경호적평개성능。
Among numerous image quality assessment(IQA) methods ,the structural similarity (SSIM) algorithm is simple ,high efficient and accurate .However ,it often does not work well when there is regional distortion or cross distortion in the image .To deal with the problem that SSIM algorithm treats the different regions of the image identically ,we took human visual characteristics in spatial domain into consideration and put forward an improved IQA method based on regional contrast and structural similarity (RCSSIM ) .The new algorithm combines regional contrast with structural similarity ,weighs and normalizes the original SSIM index to a regional contrast structural similarity metric between the reference image and the distortion im‐age to assess the image quality .The experiment results on LIVE image database show that the Pearson linear correlation coefficient (PLCC ) of the new algorithm increases by about 0 .015 and the root‐mean‐square error decreases by about 0 .55 compared with the SSIM algorithm .It indicates that the evaluation result of RCSSIM algorithm is more consistent with human visual system(HVS) characteristics and is more effective than the SSIM algorithm .