浙江大学学报(医学版)
浙江大學學報(醫學版)
절강대학학보(의학판)
JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCIENCES
2014年
6期
688-694
,共7页
胆管肿瘤/放射疗法%放射疗法,调强适形%胆管肿瘤/药物疗法%脱氧胞苷/类似物和衍生物%脱氧胞苷/治疗应用%有机铂化合物/治疗应用%综合疗法%存活率%临床对照试验
膽管腫瘤/放射療法%放射療法,調彊適形%膽管腫瘤/藥物療法%脫氧胞苷/類似物和衍生物%脫氧胞苷/治療應用%有機鉑化閤物/治療應用%綜閤療法%存活率%臨床對照試驗
담관종류/방사요법%방사요법,조강괄형%담관종류/약물요법%탈양포감/유사물화연생물%탈양포감/치료응용%유궤박화합물/치료응용%종합요법%존활솔%림상대조시험
目的:评估同步放化疗对不能手术切除的局部晚期肝外胆管癌患者的临床疗效及不良反应。方法:选取2007年2月至2012年2月绍兴市人民医院肿瘤放疗科收治的38例不能手术切除的局部晚期肝外胆管癌患者,随机分成序贯放化疗组(19例)与同步放化疗组(19例),均采用调强适形放疗,其中同步放化疗组接受吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂化疗。治疗结束后观察比较两组患者的疗效、不良反应,并进行生存分析。结果:序贯放化疗组和同步放化疗组有效率分别为42.1%(8/19)和63.2%(12/19),疾病控制率分别为78.9%(15/19)和84.2%(16/19),中位疾病无进展生存时间分别为8.3和10.4个月,中位总生存时间分别为14.2和15.6个月,其中中位疾病无进展生存时间两组间差异有统计学意义( P=0.037)。两组患者放化疗不良反应均可控,其发生率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论:对于不能手术且体力状况评分≤2分的局部晚期肝外胆管癌患者,序贯放化疗与同步放化疗均能有效延长疾病无进展生存时间和总生存时间,且耐受性良好,其中同步放化疗效果可能更佳。
目的:評估同步放化療對不能手術切除的跼部晚期肝外膽管癌患者的臨床療效及不良反應。方法:選取2007年2月至2012年2月紹興市人民醫院腫瘤放療科收治的38例不能手術切除的跼部晚期肝外膽管癌患者,隨機分成序貫放化療組(19例)與同步放化療組(19例),均採用調彊適形放療,其中同步放化療組接受吉西他濱聯閤奧沙利鉑化療。治療結束後觀察比較兩組患者的療效、不良反應,併進行生存分析。結果:序貫放化療組和同步放化療組有效率分彆為42.1%(8/19)和63.2%(12/19),疾病控製率分彆為78.9%(15/19)和84.2%(16/19),中位疾病無進展生存時間分彆為8.3和10.4箇月,中位總生存時間分彆為14.2和15.6箇月,其中中位疾病無進展生存時間兩組間差異有統計學意義( P=0.037)。兩組患者放化療不良反應均可控,其髮生率差異均無統計學意義(均P>0.05)。結論:對于不能手術且體力狀況評分≤2分的跼部晚期肝外膽管癌患者,序貫放化療與同步放化療均能有效延長疾病無進展生存時間和總生存時間,且耐受性良好,其中同步放化療效果可能更佳。
목적:평고동보방화료대불능수술절제적국부만기간외담관암환자적림상료효급불량반응。방법:선취2007년2월지2012년2월소흥시인민의원종류방료과수치적38례불능수술절제적국부만기간외담관암환자,수궤분성서관방화료조(19례)여동보방화료조(19례),균채용조강괄형방료,기중동보방화료조접수길서타빈연합오사리박화료。치료결속후관찰비교량조환자적료효、불량반응,병진행생존분석。결과:서관방화료조화동보방화료조유효솔분별위42.1%(8/19)화63.2%(12/19),질병공제솔분별위78.9%(15/19)화84.2%(16/19),중위질병무진전생존시간분별위8.3화10.4개월,중위총생존시간분별위14.2화15.6개월,기중중위질병무진전생존시간량조간차이유통계학의의( P=0.037)。량조환자방화료불량반응균가공,기발생솔차이균무통계학의의(균P>0.05)。결론:대우불능수술차체력상황평분≤2분적국부만기간외담관암환자,서관방화료여동보방화료균능유효연장질병무진전생존시간화총생존시간,차내수성량호,기중동보방화료효과가능경가。
Obj ective: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Me thods:Thirty-eight patients with locally advanced unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma admitted in Shaoxing People's Hospital from February 2007 to February 2012 were enrolled in the study. They were randomized into sequential chemoradiotherapy( n =19 ) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy group ( n =19 ) .All patients were treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy ( IMRT ) . Patients in concurrent chemoradiotherapy group received the regimen of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin.Tumor response and adverse effects were observed periodically.The primary end points were disease progression-free survival ( PFS ) and overall survival ( OS) .Results: The response rates of sequential chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy groups were 42.1% ( 8/19 ) and 63.2% ( 12/19 ) .The disease control rates of them were 78.9% (15/19) and 84.2% (16/19), respectively.The median PFS of sequential chemoradiotherapy group and concurrent chemoradiotherapy group was 8.3 (95%CI:7.6 -9.0) and 10.4 months (95%CI: 9.4 -11.4, P=0.037) , and the median OS in two groups were 14.2 ( 95%CI: 12.6 -15.8 ) and 15.6 months (95%CI: 14.2 -17.0, P =0.095), respectively.The major adverse reactions were controllable hematology toxicity and gastrointestinal reaction.There was no significant difference in incidence of adverse reactions between two groups ( P >0.05).Conclusion: Sequential chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy may improve PFS and OS in patients with locally advanced unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and both are well-tolerated.In addition, concurrent chemoradiotherapy might provide additional PFS benefit and would be preferable.