河北医学
河北醫學
하북의학
HEBEI MEDICINE
2015年
4期
581-583,584
,共4页
布地奈德%泼尼松%慢性阻塞性肺疾病%肺功能%安全性
佈地奈德%潑尼鬆%慢性阻塞性肺疾病%肺功能%安全性
포지내덕%발니송%만성조새성폐질병%폐공능%안전성
Budesonide%Prednisone%COPD%Pulmonary function%Safety
目的:观察布地奈德与泼尼松在阻抑和治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病( COPD)继发诱导肺间质纤维化患者中的地位和作用,并对两药的安全性进行对比分析。方法:将COPD继发肺间质纤维化患者随机分为布地奈德组(A组)34例,泼尼松组36例(B组),A组给予布地奈德2mg/次(1次/8h)雾化吸入,B组给予泼尼松龙静脉滴注,40mg/次(1次/q12h),分别对比治疗3、5、10d时患者FEV1/预汁值、Pao2、PaCO2情况,并对治疗期间的临床症状评分及不良反应进行对比。结果:治疗后两组FEV1/预计值和动脉血气 PaO2均较入院时升高, PaCO2较入院时降低,其中治疗5d、10d 时 A 组FEV1/预计值/Pa02较B组明显升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经治疗,两组的临床症状评分均明显下降,其中,治疗10d时A组较B组的得分明显降低,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。两组患者总不良事件发生率没有显著性差异( P>0.05)。结论:布地奈德和泼尼松均能改善COPD继发肺间质纤维化患者的肺功能状况,但布地奈德在提高FEV1/预汁值、PaO2、临床症状评分及减少应激反应的中具有长远作用。
目的:觀察佈地奈德與潑尼鬆在阻抑和治療慢性阻塞性肺疾病( COPD)繼髮誘導肺間質纖維化患者中的地位和作用,併對兩藥的安全性進行對比分析。方法:將COPD繼髮肺間質纖維化患者隨機分為佈地奈德組(A組)34例,潑尼鬆組36例(B組),A組給予佈地奈德2mg/次(1次/8h)霧化吸入,B組給予潑尼鬆龍靜脈滴註,40mg/次(1次/q12h),分彆對比治療3、5、10d時患者FEV1/預汁值、Pao2、PaCO2情況,併對治療期間的臨床癥狀評分及不良反應進行對比。結果:治療後兩組FEV1/預計值和動脈血氣 PaO2均較入院時升高, PaCO2較入院時降低,其中治療5d、10d 時 A 組FEV1/預計值/Pa02較B組明顯升高,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。經治療,兩組的臨床癥狀評分均明顯下降,其中,治療10d時A組較B組的得分明顯降低,差異有統計學意義( P<0.05)。兩組患者總不良事件髮生率沒有顯著性差異( P>0.05)。結論:佈地奈德和潑尼鬆均能改善COPD繼髮肺間質纖維化患者的肺功能狀況,但佈地奈德在提高FEV1/預汁值、PaO2、臨床癥狀評分及減少應激反應的中具有長遠作用。
목적:관찰포지내덕여발니송재조억화치료만성조새성폐질병( COPD)계발유도폐간질섬유화환자중적지위화작용,병대량약적안전성진행대비분석。방법:장COPD계발폐간질섬유화환자수궤분위포지내덕조(A조)34례,발니송조36례(B조),A조급여포지내덕2mg/차(1차/8h)무화흡입,B조급여발니송룡정맥적주,40mg/차(1차/q12h),분별대비치료3、5、10d시환자FEV1/예즙치、Pao2、PaCO2정황,병대치료기간적림상증상평분급불량반응진행대비。결과:치료후량조FEV1/예계치화동맥혈기 PaO2균교입원시승고, PaCO2교입원시강저,기중치료5d、10d 시 A 조FEV1/예계치/Pa02교B조명현승고,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。경치료,량조적림상증상평분균명현하강,기중,치료10d시A조교B조적득분명현강저,차이유통계학의의( P<0.05)。량조환자총불량사건발생솔몰유현저성차이( P>0.05)。결론:포지내덕화발니송균능개선COPD계발폐간질섬유화환자적폐공능상황,단포지내덕재제고FEV1/예즙치、PaO2、림상증상평분급감소응격반응적중구유장원작용。
Objective:To observe lung function of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( COPD) secondary repressor and induced pulmonary fibrosis ,compare the safety of the two drugs .Method:The patients with COPD secondary to pulmonary interstitial fibrosis were randomly divided into the budes -onide group (Group A, 34 cases) and prednisone group (Group B,36 patients).Group A were given budes-onide 2mg for onec (1/8h) inhalation, group B were given prednisolone intravenously , 40mg for once (1 /q12h), compared the FEV1/pre-juice value, PaO2, PaCO2 situation after treatment of 3,5, l0 days ,clini-cal symptom scores and adverse reactions were compared either .Result:After treatment, FEV1 /pre-juice value and arterial blood gas PaO 2 , PaCO2 lower than the time of admission , at 5 days, 10 days, group A of FEV1 /pre-juice value,PaO2 were significantly higher than that in group B , the difference there was statisti-cally significant (P<0.05).After treatment, both groups were significantly decreased the clinical symptom scores, at 10 days,the scores of group A was lower than group B , the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups of patients overall incidence of ad-verse events (P>0.05).Conclusion: Budesonide and prednisone can improve lung function among COPD patients with interstitial fibrosis secondary lung , but budesonide has a long-term effects in improving FEV1 /pre-juice value, PaO2, clinical symptom scores and reduce the stress response .