世界睡眠医学杂志
世界睡眠醫學雜誌
세계수면의학잡지
2014年
5期
277-280
,共4页
鲁红娟%吴东辉%张斌%贾福军
魯紅娟%吳東輝%張斌%賈福軍
로홍연%오동휘%장빈%가복군
抑郁症%快眼动睡眠潜伏期%文拉法辛%临床疗效
抑鬱癥%快眼動睡眠潛伏期%文拉法辛%臨床療效
억욱증%쾌안동수면잠복기%문랍법신%림상료효
Depression%Rapid Eye Movement sleep latency%Venlafaxine%Clinical effect
目的:探讨抑郁症患者快眼动睡眠潜伏期(REML)与文拉法辛疗效的关系。方法根据 REML 长短将入组患者分为2组,REML 缩短组(REML <70 min)25例,REML 正常组(70~90 min)25例。在文拉法辛治疗前及治疗后第1、2、4、6周末根据汉密尔顿抑郁17项量表(HAMD-17)得分进行疗效评定,并对基线 REML 和6周末疗效(减分率)进行相关分析。结果6周末,2组组内治疗前后比较差异有统计学意义(P <0.01)。治疗第1、2、4、6周,组间减分无统计学意义(P >0.05),疗效相当(P >0.05)。相关分析显示基线 REML 长短与6周末疗效之间不存在明显相关(r =0.155,P =0.282)。结论不能单纯通过基线 REML 长短来预测文拉法辛的临床疗效,基线 REML 与文拉法辛疗效之间不存在明显相关。
目的:探討抑鬱癥患者快眼動睡眠潛伏期(REML)與文拉法辛療效的關繫。方法根據 REML 長短將入組患者分為2組,REML 縮短組(REML <70 min)25例,REML 正常組(70~90 min)25例。在文拉法辛治療前及治療後第1、2、4、6週末根據漢密爾頓抑鬱17項量錶(HAMD-17)得分進行療效評定,併對基線 REML 和6週末療效(減分率)進行相關分析。結果6週末,2組組內治療前後比較差異有統計學意義(P <0.01)。治療第1、2、4、6週,組間減分無統計學意義(P >0.05),療效相噹(P >0.05)。相關分析顯示基線 REML 長短與6週末療效之間不存在明顯相關(r =0.155,P =0.282)。結論不能單純通過基線 REML 長短來預測文拉法辛的臨床療效,基線 REML 與文拉法辛療效之間不存在明顯相關。
목적:탐토억욱증환자쾌안동수면잠복기(REML)여문랍법신료효적관계。방법근거 REML 장단장입조환자분위2조,REML 축단조(REML <70 min)25례,REML 정상조(70~90 min)25례。재문랍법신치료전급치료후제1、2、4、6주말근거한밀이돈억욱17항량표(HAMD-17)득분진행료효평정,병대기선 REML 화6주말료효(감분솔)진행상관분석。결과6주말,2조조내치료전후비교차이유통계학의의(P <0.01)。치료제1、2、4、6주,조간감분무통계학의의(P >0.05),료효상당(P >0.05)。상관분석현시기선 REML 장단여6주말료효지간불존재명현상관(r =0.155,P =0.282)。결론불능단순통과기선 REML 장단래예측문랍법신적림상료효,기선 REML 여문랍법신료효지간불존재명현상관。
Objective To investigate the relationship between Rapid Eye Movement latency and the antidepressant effect of Venlafaxine in Depressive Patients.Methods According to the length of the REM sleep latency (REML),all patients took Venlafaxine were divided into two groups,25 patients with shortened REML and 25 patients with normal REML.The effica-cy was measured with the Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD-17)at baseline and on weeks 1,2,4 and.6.Then used correlation analysis by examining the REML and efficacy relationship.Results The HAMD scores of two groups decreased significantly from the first weekend to the sixth weekend(P <0.01).There were no significant differences in the 1,2,and 4,6 weeks medica-tion between two groups(P >0.05),and they have the same clinical effect(P >0.05).The efficacy of sixth weekend has no sig-nificant correlation with REML before treatment(r =-0.129,P =0.372).Conclusion REML before treatment could not exact-ly predict the response to the treatment with Venlafaxine and there was no significant correlation with REML and the efficacy of sixth weekend.