中国现代医生
中國現代醫生
중국현대의생
CHINA MODERN DOCTOR
2015年
3期
124-126
,共3页
颅脑外伤综合征%中西医结合
顱腦外傷綜閤徵%中西醫結閤
로뇌외상종합정%중서의결합
Brain trauma syndrome%Integrative medicine
目的：探讨中西医结合治疗颅脑外伤综合征的疗效。方法回顾性分析2012年11月~2014年6月间来我院就诊的颅脑外伤综合征患者162例，按照治疗方法不同分为两组，对照组和观察组各81例。对照组采用西医治疗，给予包括止血、降颅压、防治感染、神经营养支持等在内的常规治疗，观察组采用中西医结合治疗，即在对照组治疗基础上加用活血化瘀汤治疗。比较两组患者的临床疗效及脑血流变化程度。结果观察组总有效率为91.36%，对照组为76.54%；观察组脑血流改善率为88.89%，对照组为75.31%，观察组较对照组治疗总有效率、脑血流改善率明显较高，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论颅脑外伤综合征患者采用中西医结合方法治疗疗效显著，可显著提高治疗总有效率，明显改善脑血流，可作为一种有效的治疗方法在临床推广应用。
目的：探討中西醫結閤治療顱腦外傷綜閤徵的療效。方法迴顧性分析2012年11月~2014年6月間來我院就診的顱腦外傷綜閤徵患者162例，按照治療方法不同分為兩組，對照組和觀察組各81例。對照組採用西醫治療，給予包括止血、降顱壓、防治感染、神經營養支持等在內的常規治療，觀察組採用中西醫結閤治療，即在對照組治療基礎上加用活血化瘀湯治療。比較兩組患者的臨床療效及腦血流變化程度。結果觀察組總有效率為91.36%，對照組為76.54%；觀察組腦血流改善率為88.89%，對照組為75.31%，觀察組較對照組治療總有效率、腦血流改善率明顯較高，差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。結論顱腦外傷綜閤徵患者採用中西醫結閤方法治療療效顯著，可顯著提高治療總有效率，明顯改善腦血流，可作為一種有效的治療方法在臨床推廣應用。
목적：탐토중서의결합치료로뇌외상종합정적료효。방법회고성분석2012년11월~2014년6월간래아원취진적로뇌외상종합정환자162례，안조치료방법불동분위량조，대조조화관찰조각81례。대조조채용서의치료，급여포괄지혈、강로압、방치감염、신경영양지지등재내적상규치료，관찰조채용중서의결합치료，즉재대조조치료기출상가용활혈화어탕치료。비교량조환자적림상료효급뇌혈류변화정도。결과관찰조총유효솔위91.36%，대조조위76.54%；관찰조뇌혈류개선솔위88.89%，대조조위75.31%，관찰조교대조조치료총유효솔、뇌혈류개선솔명현교고，차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론로뇌외상종합정환자채용중서의결합방법치료료효현저，가현저제고치료총유효솔，명현개선뇌혈류，가작위일충유효적치료방법재림상추엄응용。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of traumatic brain injury syndrome treated with integrative medicine. Methods A total of 162 cases with traumatic brain syndrome collected from November 2012 to June 2014 in our hos-pital were retrospective analyzed, and they were divided into control group and observation group according to different treatment methods, each group had 81 cases respectively, the control group was treated with western medicine, they were given conventional treatment, including stanch bleeding, reducing intracranial pressure, prevent infection, nerve nutritional support and so on, the observation group was treated with the combination therapy, they used huoxuehuayu-tang on the bases of the control group. The clinical efficacy and the extent of changes in cerebral blood flow of two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 91.36%, while the control group was 76.54%, The improvement in cerebral blood flow in the observation group was 88.89%, the control group was 75.31%, the total efficiency and improvement in cerebral blood flow of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group, the difference between the two groups was significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Syndrome patients with traumatic brain injury integrative method of treatment effect is significant, can significantly improve the overall efficiency of the treatment, significantly improve cerebral blood flow, can be used as an effective treatment method in clinical application.
