实用癌症杂志
實用癌癥雜誌
실용암증잡지
THE PRACTICAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
2015年
2期
273-275,278
,共4页
子宫内膜癌%腹腔镜手术%传统开腹术
子宮內膜癌%腹腔鏡手術%傳統開腹術
자궁내막암%복강경수술%전통개복술
Endometrial cancer%Laparoscopic surgery%Traditional open surgery
目的:比较与分析开腹与腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌患者的临床效果。方法选取66例子宫内膜癌患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为对照组和治疗组。对照组采用传统开腹手术治疗;治疗组采用腹腔镜手术治疗。比较两组患者术前、术后4 d CD4/CD8水平和IgG表达情况。同时观察两组患者术中出血量和手术时间及肛门排气时间、术后自主下床活动时间等。结果治疗后治疗组患者术中出血量和手术时间及肛门排气时间、术后自主下床活动时间、留置尿管时间、平均住院时间分别为(120.24±6.17)ml、(64.19±9.47)min、(0.67±0.18)d、(3.19±0.71)d、(0.61±0.17)d、(12.47±2.41)d;对照组分别为(347.96±11.75)ml、(98.71±10.15)min、(1.69±0.47)d、(6.27±0.82)d、(2.12±0.31)d、(18.36±3.15)d,两组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。治疗组患者术后发热发生率和并发症发生率分别为6.06%、6.06%,明显低于对照组的18.18%、18.18%(χ2=3.75,7.88,P均<0.05)。术后4 d,治疗组患者4 d CD4/CD8水平和IgG表达水平与对照组比较有显著性差异( P<0.05)。结论与传统开腹手术比较,采用腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌患者,患者创伤小,同时对患者体液免疫和细胞免疫功能影响较小,对患者术后恢复有一定帮助。
目的:比較與分析開腹與腹腔鏡手術治療子宮內膜癌患者的臨床效果。方法選取66例子宮內膜癌患者作為研究對象,按照隨機數字錶法分為對照組和治療組。對照組採用傳統開腹手術治療;治療組採用腹腔鏡手術治療。比較兩組患者術前、術後4 d CD4/CD8水平和IgG錶達情況。同時觀察兩組患者術中齣血量和手術時間及肛門排氣時間、術後自主下床活動時間等。結果治療後治療組患者術中齣血量和手術時間及肛門排氣時間、術後自主下床活動時間、留置尿管時間、平均住院時間分彆為(120.24±6.17)ml、(64.19±9.47)min、(0.67±0.18)d、(3.19±0.71)d、(0.61±0.17)d、(12.47±2.41)d;對照組分彆為(347.96±11.75)ml、(98.71±10.15)min、(1.69±0.47)d、(6.27±0.82)d、(2.12±0.31)d、(18.36±3.15)d,兩組比較有顯著性差異(P<0.05)。治療組患者術後髮熱髮生率和併髮癥髮生率分彆為6.06%、6.06%,明顯低于對照組的18.18%、18.18%(χ2=3.75,7.88,P均<0.05)。術後4 d,治療組患者4 d CD4/CD8水平和IgG錶達水平與對照組比較有顯著性差異( P<0.05)。結論與傳統開腹手術比較,採用腹腔鏡手術治療子宮內膜癌患者,患者創傷小,同時對患者體液免疫和細胞免疫功能影響較小,對患者術後恢複有一定幫助。
목적:비교여분석개복여복강경수술치료자궁내막암환자적림상효과。방법선취66례자궁내막암환자작위연구대상,안조수궤수자표법분위대조조화치료조。대조조채용전통개복수술치료;치료조채용복강경수술치료。비교량조환자술전、술후4 d CD4/CD8수평화IgG표체정황。동시관찰량조환자술중출혈량화수술시간급항문배기시간、술후자주하상활동시간등。결과치료후치료조환자술중출혈량화수술시간급항문배기시간、술후자주하상활동시간、류치뇨관시간、평균주원시간분별위(120.24±6.17)ml、(64.19±9.47)min、(0.67±0.18)d、(3.19±0.71)d、(0.61±0.17)d、(12.47±2.41)d;대조조분별위(347.96±11.75)ml、(98.71±10.15)min、(1.69±0.47)d、(6.27±0.82)d、(2.12±0.31)d、(18.36±3.15)d,량조비교유현저성차이(P<0.05)。치료조환자술후발열발생솔화병발증발생솔분별위6.06%、6.06%,명현저우대조조적18.18%、18.18%(χ2=3.75,7.88,P균<0.05)。술후4 d,치료조환자4 d CD4/CD8수평화IgG표체수평여대조조비교유현저성차이( P<0.05)。결론여전통개복수술비교,채용복강경수술치료자궁내막암환자,환자창상소,동시대환자체액면역화세포면역공능영향교소,대환자술후회복유일정방조。
Objective To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of open and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial car-cinoma.Methods 66 endometrial carcinoma patients were selected as the research object.And according to random number ta-ble method were grouped into the control group and the treatment group.The control group received the traditional laparotomy sur-gery;The treatment group received the laparoscopic surgery.Preoperative and postoperative 4 d CD4/CD8 levels and IgG expres-sion of the 2 groups were observed and compared.Intraoperative blood loss,operation time,the anus exhaust time,postoperative autonomous bed activity time of the 2 groups were observed.Results After treatment,blood loss,operative time,anal exhaust time,after independent ambulation,indwelling catheter time,and the average length of hospital stay were(120.24 ±6.17) ml, (64.19 ±9.47) min,(0.67 ±0.18) d,(3.19 ±0.71) d,(0.61 ±0.17) d,(12.47 ±2.41) d;the control group were(347.96 ±11.75) ml,(98.71 ±10.15) min,(1.69 ±0.47 ) d,(6.27 ±0.82) d,(2.12 ±0.31) d,(18.36 ±3.15) d,there was significant difference( P<0.05) between the 2 groups.Postoperative fever incidence and complication rates of the treatment group were 6.06%,6.06%,significantly lower than 18.18%,18.18%(χ2 =3.75,7.88,P<0.05) in the control group.Postoperative 4 d,there was a significant difference(P<0.05) in 4 d CD4/CD8 expression levels and IgG levels between the 2 groups.Conclu-sion Compared with traditional open surgery,laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer has small effect on humoral and cellu-lar immune function,with small trauma,it is of some help on postoperative recovery.