护理学报
護理學報
호이학보
JOURNAL OF NURSING
2015年
2期
4-6
,共3页
赵小红%赵红%孙晓蕊%郭文
趙小紅%趙紅%孫曉蕊%郭文
조소홍%조홍%손효예%곽문
老年%吞咽障碍%插胃管%护理%尿毒症
老年%吞嚥障礙%插胃管%護理%尿毒癥
노년%탄인장애%삽위관%호리%뇨독증
elderly patient%swallowing disorder%gastric tube intubation%nursing%uremia
目的:探讨并评价改良插胃管法在老年尿毒症吞咽障碍患者中应用的效果。方法将41例肾内科老年尿毒症吞咽障碍需要鼻饲患者作为研究对象,按照入院的先后顺序分为对照组20例和改良组21例。对照组采用传统插胃管法,改良组采用改良插胃管法。观察比较两组患者置管成功率、置管时间、恶心呕吐和呛咳发生率。结果改良组1次置管成功率、2次置管成功率明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(字2=4.111,字2=4.221,均P<0.05);改良组置管时间明显少于对照组(t=2.271,P<0.05),置管时呛咳发生率低于对照组(字2=4.667,P<0.05),差异有统计学意义。而两组患者恶心呕吐发生率比较差异无统计学意义(字2=0.006, P>0.05),置管费用无差异。结论改良插胃管法能显著提高置管成功率,缩短置管时间,减轻患者痛苦。
目的:探討併評價改良插胃管法在老年尿毒癥吞嚥障礙患者中應用的效果。方法將41例腎內科老年尿毒癥吞嚥障礙需要鼻飼患者作為研究對象,按照入院的先後順序分為對照組20例和改良組21例。對照組採用傳統插胃管法,改良組採用改良插胃管法。觀察比較兩組患者置管成功率、置管時間、噁心嘔吐和嗆咳髮生率。結果改良組1次置管成功率、2次置管成功率明顯高于對照組,差異有統計學意義(字2=4.111,字2=4.221,均P<0.05);改良組置管時間明顯少于對照組(t=2.271,P<0.05),置管時嗆咳髮生率低于對照組(字2=4.667,P<0.05),差異有統計學意義。而兩組患者噁心嘔吐髮生率比較差異無統計學意義(字2=0.006, P>0.05),置管費用無差異。結論改良插胃管法能顯著提高置管成功率,縮短置管時間,減輕患者痛苦。
목적:탐토병평개개량삽위관법재노년뇨독증탄인장애환자중응용적효과。방법장41례신내과노년뇨독증탄인장애수요비사환자작위연구대상,안조입원적선후순서분위대조조20례화개량조21례。대조조채용전통삽위관법,개량조채용개량삽위관법。관찰비교량조환자치관성공솔、치관시간、악심구토화창해발생솔。결과개량조1차치관성공솔、2차치관성공솔명현고우대조조,차이유통계학의의(자2=4.111,자2=4.221,균P<0.05);개량조치관시간명현소우대조조(t=2.271,P<0.05),치관시창해발생솔저우대조조(자2=4.667,P<0.05),차이유통계학의의。이량조환자악심구토발생솔비교차이무통계학의의(자2=0.006, P>0.05),치관비용무차이。결론개량삽위관법능현저제고치관성공솔,축단치관시간,감경환자통고。
Objective To evaluate the effect of improved gastric tuber intubation on elderly uremia patients with swallowing disorder. Methods Forty-one elderly uremia patients with swallowing disorder were divided into control group with convention gastric tuber intubation (n=20) and experiment group with improved gastric tuber intubation (n=21). Success rate of intubation, intubation time, the incidence of nausea, vomiting and bucking were compared in two groups. Results The one-time and second-time success rate of gastric tube intubation in experiment group were higher than those in control group, which indicated statistical significance (χ2=4.111,χ2=4.221,P<0.05) and there was shorter intubation time (t=2.271,P<0.05) and lower incidence of bucking (χ2=4.667,P<0.05) in experiment group than those in control group but there was no statistical significance in the comparison of the incidence of nausea and vomiting (χ2=0.006,P>0.05)) and the intubation cost. Conclusion The improved gastric tube intubation is effective for improving the success rate of intubation, shortening intubation time and relieving patients ’ pain.