中国临床药理学杂志
中國臨床藥理學雜誌
중국림상약이학잡지
THE CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
2015年
2期
122-126
,共5页
杨婷%路敏%周颖%崔一民
楊婷%路敏%週穎%崔一民
양정%로민%주영%최일민
非布司他%别嘌醇%有效性%安全性%痛风%Meta分析
非佈司他%彆嘌醇%有效性%安全性%痛風%Meta分析
비포사타%별표순%유효성%안전성%통풍%Meta분석
febuxostat%allopurinol%efficacy%safety%gout%Meta analysis
目的:评价非布司他与别嘌醇治疗痛风的有效性和安全性。方法在PubMed、EmBase、Cochrane图书馆、CNKI和CBM数据库中检索非布司他的随机对照试验( RCTs )。2名作者分别独立进行文献筛选、质量评价和数据提取,根据Cochrane系统评价的原理和方法,使用Cochrane协作网提供的RevMan 5.2.7软件进行Meta分析。结果 Meta分析最终纳入5个RCTs。与别嘌醇相比,接受非布司他治疗的患者血清尿酸(sUA)水平更易于降低至6 mg· dL-1以下,且降幅明显高于对照组(P<0.05),但是,非布司他并未降低痛风的发作率。非布司他组的不良反应发生率低于别嘌醇组。结论虽然非布司他更容易将 sUA 降至6 mg· dL-1以下,但没有证据表明非布司他预防痛风发作的效果优于别嘌醇,且非布司他价格昂贵,不应作为治疗慢性痛风的常规选择,除非患者合并肾功能不全。
目的:評價非佈司他與彆嘌醇治療痛風的有效性和安全性。方法在PubMed、EmBase、Cochrane圖書館、CNKI和CBM數據庫中檢索非佈司他的隨機對照試驗( RCTs )。2名作者分彆獨立進行文獻篩選、質量評價和數據提取,根據Cochrane繫統評價的原理和方法,使用Cochrane協作網提供的RevMan 5.2.7軟件進行Meta分析。結果 Meta分析最終納入5箇RCTs。與彆嘌醇相比,接受非佈司他治療的患者血清尿痠(sUA)水平更易于降低至6 mg· dL-1以下,且降幅明顯高于對照組(P<0.05),但是,非佈司他併未降低痛風的髮作率。非佈司他組的不良反應髮生率低于彆嘌醇組。結論雖然非佈司他更容易將 sUA 降至6 mg· dL-1以下,但沒有證據錶明非佈司他預防痛風髮作的效果優于彆嘌醇,且非佈司他價格昂貴,不應作為治療慢性痛風的常規選擇,除非患者閤併腎功能不全。
목적:평개비포사타여별표순치료통풍적유효성화안전성。방법재PubMed、EmBase、Cochrane도서관、CNKI화CBM수거고중검색비포사타적수궤대조시험( RCTs )。2명작자분별독립진행문헌사선、질량평개화수거제취,근거Cochrane계통평개적원리화방법,사용Cochrane협작망제공적RevMan 5.2.7연건진행Meta분석。결과 Meta분석최종납입5개RCTs。여별표순상비,접수비포사타치료적환자혈청뇨산(sUA)수평경역우강저지6 mg· dL-1이하,차강폭명현고우대조조(P<0.05),단시,비포사타병미강저통풍적발작솔。비포사타조적불량반응발생솔저우별표순조。결론수연비포사타경용역장 sUA 강지6 mg· dL-1이하,단몰유증거표명비포사타예방통풍발작적효과우우별표순,차비포사타개격앙귀,불응작위치료만성통풍적상규선택,제비환자합병신공능불전。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of febuxostat compared to allopurinol for the treatment of gout.Methods Randomized controlled trials ( RCTs ) of febuxostat were retrieved from PubMed , EmBase , the Cochrane Library , CNKI and CBM databases.Two revie-wers independently selected studies , assessed study quality , and extrac-ted data.According to the principles and methods of Cochrane systematic reviews , the included RCTs were analyzed by the software RevMan 5.2.7 provided by the Cochrane collaboration .Results Five studies were ulti-mately included in the analysis.Patients receiving febuxostat were more likely to achieve a serum uric acid ( sUA) of 6 mg· dL-1 than allopurinol recipients .The decline from baseline in sUA levels was more obvious in febuxostat group than allopurinol (P<0.05).However, febuxostat did not reduce the risk of gout flares compared with allopurinol .Overall , the risk of adverse drugs reaction was lower in febuxostat recipients than allopuri -nol.Conclusions Although febuxostat demonstrated a higher likelihood of achieving a target sUA level of <6 mg· dL-1 , however , there was no evidence that febuxostat is better than allopurinol for preventing gout flare .Taken its higher cost into consideration , febuxostat should not be the rou-tine option for chronic gout , except for those patients with renal dysfunction.